Back

Protein-based Diagnosis and Analysis of Co-pathologies Across Neurodegenerative Diseases: Large-Scale AI-Boosted CSF and Plasma Classification

Xu, Y.; Western, D.; Heo, G.; Nho, K.; Huang, Y.-N.; Liu, S.; Oh, H. S.-H.; Chen, Y.; Timsina, J.; Liu, M.; Tang, Y.; Gong, K.; Buddle, J.; Krish, V.; Imam, F.; Puerta Fuentes, R.; Cano, A.; Marquie, M.; Boada, M.; Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight-ADRC), ; Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN), ; Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), ; ACE Alzheimer Center Barcelona (ACE), ; Barcelona-1, ; Stanford Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Stanford-ADRC), ; The Global Neurodegeneration Proteomics Consortium (GNPC), ; Pastor, P.; Ruiz, A.; Fernandez, M. V.; B

2025-07-10 neurology
10.1101/2025.07.09.25331192 medRxiv
Show abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases (including Alzheimers disease, Parkinsons disease, Frontotemporal dementia, and Dementia with Lewy bodies) pose diagnostic challenges due to overlapping pathology and clinical heterogeneity. We leveraged proteomic data from more than 21,000 cerebrospinal fluid and plasma samples to develop and validate explainable, boosting-based multi-disease AI classifiers. The models achieved weighted AUCs in the testing datasets of 0.97 for CSF and 0.88 for plasma, equivalent to traditional biomarkers. The model was validated with neuropathological and clinical data, confirming robust generalizability without any retraining. Using zero-shot learning, we classified disease subtypes including autosomal dominant AD and prodromal PD and clarified disease states for those with conflicting clinical information. The model also showed the ability to prioritize cognitively normal individuals at disease risk. This framework enabled the identification and quantification of continuous, individual-level disease probabilities that allow for the quantification of overlap across diseases and co-pathologies within an individual. Through this work, we establish a benchmark computational framework for enhancing diagnostic precision in NDs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.