Back

Cachexia in Clinical Practice: Experience from an Endocrine-Led Care Model

Murthy, A.; Simons, M.; Jablonski, A.; Hurd, M.; Shukla, A.; Goncalves, M. D.

2025-07-10 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.07.09.25331020 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCachexia is a multifactorial syndrome of involuntary weight loss, skeletal muscle wasting, and metabolic dysregulation, commonly seen in advanced cancer and other chronic diseases. Despite its prevalence and prognostic significance, effective treatment strategies remain limited, and there is no standardized model of outpatient care in the US. ObjectiveTo describe the structure, patient characteristics, and outcomes of a multidisciplinary cancer cachexia clinic embedded within an academic endocrinology practice. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 103 patients referred to a single-center cachexia clinic over five years. Patients underwent comprehensive assessments including weight trajectory, nutritional status, physical performance (5x sit-to-stand test, handgrip strength), and received individualized interventions involving nutrition counseling, resistance training, and pharmacologic management. ResultsThe median patient age was 69.7 years, with 64.1% having a cancer diagnosis (61.0% with metastases). Median monthly weight loss decreased from -0.5 kg/month in the 6 months pre-enrollment to 0.0 kg/month after 3 months post enrollment (p < 0.0001), indicating significant stabilization. The 5x sit-to-stand test improved (p = 0.022), though handgrip strength remained unchanged. Patients prescribed an exercise video program trended toward greater weight gain ({beta} = +1.988, p = 0.079), while those prescribed protein powder tended to experience more weight loss ({beta} = -2.102, p = 0.113), although this difference was not statistically significant. ConclusionA multimodal cachexia clinic can stabilize weight loss and improve physical function in medically complex patients. These findings support the integration of interdisciplinary approaches to cachexia management and provide a framework for evaluating future interventions in routine clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.0%
2
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.8%
4
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
6
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Journal of the Endocrine Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
12
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
13
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
15
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
16
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%