Identifying rare spontaneous mutations through wildtype E. coli population sequencing
Green, R.; Bawn, M.; Angus-Whiteoak, A.; Jago, M.; Whelan, F. J.; Lagator, M.; Hall, N.; Knight, C. G.; Krasovec, R.
Show abstract
Understanding the rate and types of mutations occurring in different populations is fundamental to our ability to predict and potentially manipulate evolution. Common techniques for microbial mutation rate estimation fall into 2 camps; rapid, locus specific, generally liquid-culture based fluctuation assays; and slow, genome-wide, generally solid-culture based mutation accumulation experiments. This constrains the hypotheses which can be tested, notably the mutagenic effects of liquid environments cannot be rapidly quantified at a genome-wide scale. One example of such effect is the negative association previously observed between population density and mutation rates at many marker loci using the fluctuation assay. Because homogeneous population density is specifically relevant in liquid culture, this association has not been tested at a truly genome-wide scale. We fill this methodological gap by developing a novel pipeline that relies on population sequencing to capture how mutation rates are affected by population density in liquid cultures. We simulate expected mutation counts in a growing population along with random sampling during sequencing to estimate the necessary sequencing coverage as [≥]1,000-fold. We then carry out PCR-free sequencing of 95 wildtype E. coli populations at this coverage, calling rare variants with both reference-based and reference-free methods. These variant-calling methods are prone to different sources of error which can be minimised by considering only mutations called by both pipelines. This approach identifies 119 mutations across all cultures, with (non)coding/(non)synonymous and mutational spectrum profiles consistent with being samples of spontaneous mutation unbiased by selection. The distribution of these mutations also supports the motivating hypothesis, finding that mutation counts across the genome are strongly negatively associated with population density. This demonstrates the utility of population sequencing for the rapid testing of many previously inaccessible evolutionary biology hypotheses.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamics of mutation accumulation and adaptation during three years of evolution under long-term stationary phase 95%
- Multilevel gene expression changes inlineages containing adaptive copy numbervariants 94%
- The dynamics of adaptation to stress from standing genetic variation and de novo mutations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- CDMAP/CDVIS: Context-dependent Mutation Analysis Package and Visualization Software 94%
- Loss of altruism in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum is associated with the G protein-coupled receptor grlG 93%
- Beyond the reference: gene expression variation and transcriptional response to RNAi in C. elegans 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary dynamics of asexual hypermutators adapting to a novel environment 95%
- Divergent evolution of mutation rates and biases in the long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli 95%
- Contribution of spontaneous mutations to quantitative and molecular variation at the highly repetitive rDNA locus in yeast 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexing Mutation Rate Assessment: Determining Pathogenicity of Msh2 Variants in S. cerevisiae 94%
- The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation in C. elegans revealed by multi-strain allele-specific analysis 93%
- Machine learning techniques for classifying the mutagenic origins of point mutations 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.