Back

Structural basis of DNA N6-adenine methylation in eukaryotes

Nan, B.; Yang, W.; Wang, D.; Nie, L.; Wang, Y.; Xu, M.; Guan, W.; Chen, Z.; Zhuang, G.; Gao, S.; Liu, Y.

2025-07-08 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.08.663716 bioRxiv
Show abstract

N6-adenine methylation occurs in both DNA and RNA (referred to as 6mA and m6A, respectively). As an extensively characterized epi-transcriptomic mark found in virtually all eukaryotes, m6A in mRNA is deposited by METTL3-METTL14 complex. As a transcription-associated epigenetic mark abundantly present in many unicellular eukaryotes, 6mA is coordinately maintained by two AMT1 complexes, distinguished by their mutually exclusive subunits, AMT6 and AMT7. These are all members of MT-A70 family methyltransferases (MTases). Despite their functional importance, no structure for holo-complexes with cognate DNA/RNA substrate has been resolved. Here, we employ AlphaFold3 (AF3) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for structural modeling of Tetrahymena AMT1 complexes, with emphasis on ternary holo-complexes with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) substrate and cofactor. Key structural features observed in these models are validated by mutagenesis and various other biophysical and biochemical approaches. Our analysis reveals the structural basis for DNA substrate recognition, base flipping, and catalysis in the prototypical eukaryotic DNA 6mA-MTase. It also allows us to delineate the reaction pathway for processive DNA methylation involving translocation of the closed form AMT1 complex along dsDNA. As the active site is highly conserved across MT-A70 family of eukaryotic 6mA/m6A-MTases, the structural insight will facilitate rational design of small molecule inhibitors, especially for METTL3-METTL14, a promising target in cancer therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.