Back

Strengths of relationships among soil microbial and organic matter properties are scale-dependent

Simon, E.; Guseva, K.; Alteio, L. V.; Kaiser, C.

2025-07-12 ecology
10.1101/2025.07.08.663705 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Relationships among variables in ecological systems are inherently scale-dependent, especially in heterogeneous systems. Yet it remains to be examined whether relationships among variables vary across observation scales in soil. Generally, it is desirable that observation scale matches the intrinsic scale of a process or pattern. Millimetre-sized soil aggregates are closer to the intrinsic scale of microbial communities than traditionally studied bulk soil samples, making them more suitable for studying potential links between microbial communities and their environment. To explore the effect of observation scale on relationships among soil parameters, we measured bacterial, archaeal, and fungal taxa richness and density, organic matter properties (e.g., carbon and nitrogen content, stoichiometric and isotopic ratios), and soil water content in individual aggregates and aliquots of homogenised soil cores, bulk soil samples, in two soil layers. We analysed pairwise correlations among these variables and assessed whether individual aggregates systematically differed from bulk soil samples. Organic matter properties were more strongly correlated in bulk soil samples, consistent with the idea that increasing the sample volume reduces noise. In contrast, microbial community and organic matter properties showed weaker correlations in bulk soil samples than aggregates in topsoil. In addition, we found that aggregates and bulk soil samples differed systematically in individual microbial and organic matter properties, particularly in the topsoil. Our study demonstrates that relationships among variables in soil are spatial scale-dependent. Aggregates offer valuable insights into microbial communities in soil, complementing bulk soil samples, and are useful for studying links between microbial communities and their environment.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.3%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
7
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
11
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
15
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
26
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%