Sex Differences In Pharmacologic Optimal Medical Therapy For Ischemic Heart Disease, 2010-2020: An Observational Study
Alhassan, H. A.; Mann, H.; Chiu, L.; Malik, B.; Countouris, M. E.; Johnson, A. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite guideline recommendations for optimal medical therapy (OMT) in the secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease (IHD)--including antiplatelets, statins, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), and {beta}-blockers--substantial sex disparities in OMT utilization persist. The extent to which national efforts have mitigated these disparities in contemporary cohorts remains unclear. MethodsWe analyzed data from the 2011-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles, identifying adults with self-reported IHD (defined as a history of myocardial infarction or coronary heart disease). OMT use in the preceding 30 days was assessed based on participant report and verified through medication containers when available. We evaluated trends in individual drug classes and common combinations, stratified by sex. ResultsAmong 1,905 adults (mean age 65.4 years; 40.6% women), women had significantly lower rates of OMT use compared to men, including antiplatelets (68.0% vs 77.7%), statins (57.2% vs 73.9%), RAASi (45.6% vs 59.0%), and {beta}-blockers (51.2% vs 61.1%). Women were also less likely to use guideline-recommended combinations such as aspirin plus statins (47.4% vs 64.1%) and all four OMT classes (17.5% vs 32.5%). After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical factors, women remained less likely to use antiplatelets (OR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52- 0.94), statins (OR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.96), and RAASi (OR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.84), while {beta}-blocker use did not differ significantly. These sex-based disparities were consistent across all survey cycles from 2011 to 2020. ConclusionIn this nationally representative study, women with IHD were significantly less likely than men to receive guideline-directed OMT, with persistent disparities over the past decade. These findings underscore the need for targeted strategies to close the sex gap in cardiovascular prevention.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 96%
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 95%
- Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the U.S.: Results from the NIS 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events after Covid-19: a double-cohort study 93%
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 93%
- Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Stabilize Coronary Plaques in Acute Coronary Syndrome with Diabetes Mellitus 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- National Trends and Disparities in Hospitalization for Hypertensive Emergencies Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999–2019 94%
- Trends in age, sex and racial differences in the incidence of infective endocarditis in Florida and New York 93%
- Systolic Blood Pressure and Survival to Very Old Age. Results from the Women’s Health Initiative 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the risk of motor vehicle crash in the first year after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation 92%
- Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort 91%
- Place and causes of acute cardiovascular mortality during the COVID19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study of 580,972 deaths in England and Wales, 2014 to 2020 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.