Rhesus monkeys use both eye and head gaze to reallocate covert spatial attention facilitating visual perception
Shafiei, M.; Reik, M.; Görner, M.; Taubert, N.; Giese, M. A.; Thier, P.
Show abstract
Non-verbal cues, particularly eye gaze, significantly shape human social interactions. Although non-human primates reliably follow head gaze, their capacity to use eye gaze alone for inferring the others focus of attention remains debated. We investigated this question using a realistic rhesus monkey head avatar that directed its gaze toward one of two LEDs (left or right), employing either eye movements alone or combined eye and head movements. After a randomly chosen interval (ranging 50-400 ms) from gaze presentation, one LED transiently increased its luminance to near-threshold levels. Rhesus monkeys were trained to detect and report this luminance change via a saccade to the corresponding LED, independent of the avatars gaze direction, to receive rewards. Our results showed that head-gaze cues robustly directed covert attention toward gaze-congruent targets with short delays, indicative of reflex-like, stimulus-driven orienting. In contrast, eye gaze alone, at comparable amplitudes, did not affect attention shifts. However, increasing the avatars size and eye-gaze amplitude, simulating a close-range interaction, made eye gaze cues effective in guiding attention. These findings demonstrate that rhesus monkeys possess the capacity to use eye-gaze cues to determine conspecifics attentional targets, and validate and underscore the utility of 3D animal models as powerful tools for generating realistic yet precisely controlled stimuli. Our study supports the idea that eye-gaze following is not uniquely human but is an evolutionarily ancient ability, likely shared across Old World monkeys and apes which diverged more than 30 million years ago.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.