Back

Beating the gold standard: A review of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lysis using bead beating and the need for standardization.

Limberis, J. D.; Metcalfe, J. Z.

2025-07-07 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.07.663234 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bead beating is widely used for mechanical lysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a bacterium with a highly resistant, lipid-rich cell wall. Despite its status as a de facto gold standard for mycobacterial lysis, there is no standardized protocol for bead beating, resulting in significant variability across studies. We conducted a literature review of 73 studies, identifying 38 with explicit mycobacterial bead beating protocols. Our analysis revealed heterogeneity in bead types, sizes, device models, and operational parameters, with 37% of studies failing to report critical details such as lysis speed. We experimentally assessed the impact of key variables--tube type, bead quantity, and device settings--on lysis efficiency using qPCR of M. tuberculosis DNA. Results showed that even minor changes, such as tube shape or bead volume, can significantly affect DNA yield. These findings underscore the need for standardized bead-beating protocols to improve reproducibility and comparability. Future efforts should prioritize developing consensus methods tailored to sample type and analytical application.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microbiological Methods
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
10.2%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.5%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
7
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
BioTechniques
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
18
STAR Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
23
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
30
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%