Back

Direct binding of TDP-43 and Tau drives their co-condensation, but suppresses Tau fibril formation and seeding

Simonetti, F.; Zhong, W.; Hutten, S.; Uliana, F.; Schifferer, M.; Rezaei, A.; Ramirez, L. M.; Hochmair, J.; Sankar, R.; Gopalan, A.; Kielisch, F.; Riemenschneider, H.; Ruf, V.; Simons, M.; Zweckstetter, M.; Wegmann, S.; Lashley, T.; Polymenidou, M.; Edbauer, D.; Dormann, D.

2025-07-10 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.07.07.662960 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neuronal Tau aggregates are a hallmark of Alzheimers disease (AD), but more than half of the patients exhibit additional TDP-43 inclusions and some have co-aggregates of both proteins. The presence of Tau/TDP-43 co-pathology is associated with increased disease severity, although the causal relationship remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that Tau and TDP-43 mutually promote each others condensation through direct interaction in vitro, forming irregularly shaped or multiphasic co-condensates with lower TDP-43 mobility, but higher Tau dynamics. While Tau promotes TDP-43 aggregation in vitro, TDP-43 suppresses formation of Tau fibrils and instead causes formation of oligomeric Tau and Tau/TDP-43 species. These co-assemblies hinder Tau seeding in a biosensor assay specific for proteopathic Tau seeds. Consistent with this data, SarkoSpin extracts from AD brains with Tau/TDP-43 co-pathology exhibit reduced Tau seeding compared to Tau-only AD brains. In contrast, patient-derived extracts from AD brains with Tau/TDP-43 co-pathology are highly potent in seeding TDP-43 neoaggregates in a TDP-43 reporter cell line. Our results suggest that direct interaction of TDP-43 and Tau may suppress Tau pathology, while promoting TDP-43 pathology. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=133 SRC="FIGDIR/small/662960v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (23K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ed5dfaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b4ef07org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b8dbe8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6d9b49_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.