Back

Persistent Sex Disparities in Pre-hospital Delay Among STEMI Patients Despite Overall Improvements: Findings from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association Chest Pain Center Registry

Lu, Z.; Zang, T.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Shen, L.; Huang, L.

2025-07-08 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.07.07.25331066 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDWomen with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) historically experience longer pre-hospital delays than men. Whether this disparity has narrowed in China following nationwide quality initiatives remains unknown. METHODSWe analyzed 1,104,812 STEMI patients from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association Database-Chest Pain Center (2016-2023). Pre-hospital delay (symptom-to-door time) and its components (symptom-to-call [EMS call delay], call-to-door [transport delay]) were analyzed. Sex differences were assessed using multivariable quantile regression (adjusting for age, comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors), examining trends over time (2016-2019, 2020-2022, 2023). RESULTSWomen consistently experienced longer pre-hospital delays than men (median: 170 vs. 124 minutes; adjusted median difference: 24.44 min, 95%CI:22.71- 26.16, P<0.001). Although overall pre-hospital delay decreased from 2016 to 2023, the sex disparities persisted, particularly at higher delay percentiles (e.g., >60 min wider at 90th percentile by 2023). Decomposition revealed the disparity was primarily driven by EMS call delay (adjusted difference: 13.42 min, 95%CI:10.76-16.08, P<0.001), not transport delay (1.49 min, P<0.001). Younger women (<60 years) exhibited the largest relative disparity. The 2020-2022 pandemic period disrupted improvement trends, especially for EMS call delay. CONCLUSIONSDespite overall reductions in pre-hospital delay for STEMI in China, sex disparities persisted, especially younger women. Targeted interventions addressing symptom recognition and help-seeking behavior in women are urgently needed.

Published in Journal of the American Heart Association (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.