Back

Health Disparity and Geospatial Analysis among Cancer Patients in the US/Mexico Border Region of Imperial Valley

Fontelera, K.; Mendoza, A.; Francisco, C.; Hall, S.; Yang, H.; Patel, S.; Ko, E.; Tsou, M.-H.

2025-07-08 public and global health
10.1101/2025.07.07.25331030 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeDisparities in access to treatment and quality of care among cancer patients is an important issue that influences disease outcomes in minority populations. Although past research regarding the association between travel and health outcomes of cancer patients exists, studies in rural regions such as the US-Mexico border are limited. The purpose of this study is to understand the spatial patterns and travel distance association on the health outcomes of various cancers in underserved rural regions in Southern California (Imperial Valley). MethodsPatients were identified from the intake assessment data form for new patients in a community-based cancer organization (CBO) between 2006 and 2022. Analysis was conducted using ArcGIS Pro to visualize spatial patterns of cancers and to identify the relationship between travel distance and mortality. The relationship between ethnicity and cancer deaths were also investigated. Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) plots were used to visualize spatial patterns of certain groups. ResultsThere is a significant association between ethnicity and cancer deaths. The odds of death are slightly higher among Hispanics/Latinos. As hospital distance increased, the odds of mortality decreased. There were no significant associations between travel distances and any of the stages of diagnosis and death. There were three types of spatial distribution patterns of cancers respective of the overall dataset. ConclusionOur study found three types of spatial distribution patterns of various cancers in Imperial Valley. Cancer patient mortality did not have statistical significance associations with travel distance to treatment. However, further investigation and better tools may yield clearer results regarding its correlation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.