Medication errors in Intensive Care Unit: Assessment of Knowledge among Critical Care Nurses and implementation of a simple strategy to reduce errors.
Koirala, S.; Dahal, A.; Parajuli, R.; Acharya, P.; Pradhan, R.; Paudel, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundMedication errors are frequent but preventable. Critically ill patients may suffer, on average, 1.7 medical errors each day & some of which may be life-threatening. Such errors can be life-threatening because of the severity of the patients and comorbidities they have. ObjectivesTo assess the knowledge about medication error and safety among critical care nurses and assess the effect of implementation of focused intervention sessions to improve medication safety. MethodsThis is a quantitative cross-sectional study, including all nurses working in critical care areas of a tertiary level hospital. A validated questionnaire was used to collect data on Knowledge, Perception & Behavior of nurses on medication errors and patient safety. Demographic data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. All data were analyzed via SPSS using McNemars test. ResultsOur study found high baseline compliance with protocol-driven safety practices. There was a significant difference in nurses knowledge after education intervention in the use of CPOE reducing medication errors (p 0.00) and alarm noises and ward emergencies increase error risk (p 0.001). Significant differences were noted in perception of the effects of protocols/ guidelines on ensuring proper management of therapeutic processes (p 0.014). The behavioral findings demonstrate near-perfect baseline compliance across all safety practices (98.4-100%), leaving minimal room for measurable improvement. ConclusionThis study highlights significant impact of targeted education on improving critical care nurses understanding of computerized order entry and alarm-related risks, reinforcing protocol adherence. Our findings confirm mature safety cultures, and focused interventions effective than broad retraining efforts. Executive SummaryMedication errors are frequent; they can be serious, however, are also preventable. Actually, health care delivery is not perfect and errors are very common. In intensive care units (ICU), critically ill patients may suffer, on average, 1.7 medical errors each day and some of which may be life-threatening. Medication errors can happen anywhere in the hospital; however, those happening in intensive care units can be life-threatening because of the severity of the patients and various comorbidities they have. Almost one-fifth (19%) of the errors in ICU are life-threatening and almost half (42%) cause the addition of other life-sustaining supports, adding emotional, psychological and financial burdens to the patient and family. Although medication errors are increasingly accepted as a significant patient safety issue, research and studies on this topic is limited in low and middle income countries (LMICs), where healthcare systems face various restrictions. There has been minimal research on the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of critical care nurses concerning medication safety, especially in the administration of intravenous medications. This study aims to address the gap by evaluating ICU nurses comprehension of medication errors, their compliance with safety procedures, and the effect of focused interventions on enhancing safe medication practices. The objective of this study is to evaluate the nurses understanding of medication errors and patient safety. We planned to assess knowledge, perception and behavior of nurses regarding patient safety. After that, we planned to implement and analyze the impact of a focused intervention session, mainly informative meetings with each participant. Thus, we conducted a quantitative, quasi experimental, cross-sectional study with pretest - posttest design. For this, we selected nurses working in critical care settings in a tertiary hospital, namely in the ICU, CCU, HDU and post-operative ward. A validated questionnaire covering key variables - knowledge, perception, behavior and demographic details was used. Post-intervention sessions were conducted 1 week after data collection pertaining to explanation and discussion of correct answers to enhance knowledge. All the responses pretest and posttest were coded for McNemars test to assess statistical significance. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with confidence level 95%. Our study found high baseline compliance with protocol-driven safety practices. There was a significant difference in nurses knowledge after education intervention in the use of CPOE reducing medication errors (p 0.00) and alarm noises and ward emergencies increase error risk (p 0.001). Statistically significant differences were noted in participants perception of the effects of protocols/ guidelines/ procedures on ensuring proper management of therapeutic processes (p 0.014). The behavioral findings demonstrate near-perfect baseline compliance across all safety practices (98.4-100%), leaving minimal room for measurable improvement through intervention. This study highlights the significant impact of targeted education on improving critical care nurses understanding of computerized order entry and alarm-related risks, reinforcing protocol adherence where initial agreement was incomplete. Despite these improvements, the near-perfect baseline compliance with core medication safety behaviors and strong pre-existing safety perceptions indicate that most fundamental practices are already well institutionalized within the clinical setting. These findings suggest that in mature safety cultures, focused interventions are more effective than broad retraining efforts, as educational programs yield greater success when directed at specific areas requiring enhancement rather than reinforcing well-established norms. We acknowledge there is a need for further research in developing country settings to establish broader trends.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship Between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture And Patient Safety Perception In A Single Sample Of Patients: A Cross-Sectional And Correlational Study 95%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 95%
- Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multi-centre observational study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Patient Safety Curriculum: An Interventional Study on the Effectiveness of Patient Safety Education for Jordanian Nursing Students 96%
- Risks and challenges in COVID-19 infection prevention and control in a hospital setting: perspectives of healthcare workers in Thailand 94%
- Assessment of knowledge and perception of prescribers towards rational medicine use in the Ashanti Region of Ghana 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bacterial and Fungal Co-Infections among ICU COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients in a Palestinian Hospital: Incidence and Antimicrobial Stewardship 92%
- The Effect of Non-Pharmacologic Strategies on Prevention or Management of Intensive Care Unit Delirium: A Systematic Review 91%
- Recommendations from long-term care reports, commissions, and inquiries in Canada 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lessons learned from the resilience of Chinese hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 92%
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 92%
- Caregivers’ Perspective: Satisfaction With Healthcare Services At The Paediatric Specialist Clinic Of The National Referral Centre In Malaysia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 90%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 90%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.