National burden and optimal vaccine policy for Japanese encephalitis virus in Bangladesh
Perez Duque, M.; Paul, K. K.; Sultana, R.; Ribeiro dos Santos, G.; O'Driscoll, M.; Naser, A. M.; Rahman, M.; Alam, M. S.; Al-Amin, H. M.; Rahman, M. Z.; Hossain, M. E.; Paul, R. C.; Krainski, E.; Luby, S. P.; Cauchemez, S.; Vanhomwegen, J.; Gurley, E. S.; Salje, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundBangladesh first reported Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) in 1977 and has seen regular cases since, however, no JEV vaccination program currently exists. A barrier to the use of JEV vaccines has been a limited understanding of the underlying burden. MethodsWe conducted a nationally representative serological community study in 70 communities in individuals of all ages (N=2,938, October 2015-January 2016). Serum samples were tested for IgG antibodies against JEV. We developed spatially explicit serocatalytic models to estimate the underlying force of infection across the country. We then used mathematical models to estimate the annual JE disease burden currently and under different vaccination strategies. FindingsThe overall JEV seroprevalence in Bangladesh was 3.4% (95%CI: 2.8-4.1, range 0-28% across communities). The annual probability of infection was 0.005 (95%CI: 0.003-0.009), with risk greatest near border regions. We estimated that annually there are 157 clinical cases (95%CI: 89-253) and 31 deaths (95%CI: 18-52). A vaccination strategy in the 10 most affected districts in 60% of 1-15 year olds would require 5 million doses and avert 1 case per 100,000 doses over five years compared to 35 million doses and 0.5 cases averted for a nationwide campaign. No vaccination scenario was cost-effective under a willingness-to-pay of three-times gross domestic product. InterpretationA spatially targeted vaccine campaign would be most effective in reducing JEV burden, however, would still not meet standard cost effectiveness targets. FundingCDC
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Updating reproduction number estimates for mpox in the Democratic Republic of Congo using surveillance data 93%
- Relative burdens of the COVID-19, malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa 93%
- Spatial Patterns of Dengue Incidence in Nepal During Record Outbreaks in 2022 and 2023: Implications for Public Health Interventions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 vaccination in Kenya 94%
- Global and regional burden of attributable and associated bacterial antimicrobial resistance avertable by vaccination: modelling study 93%
- COVID-19 Mortality in Women and Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Cross Sectional Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of Lassa fever incidence rates in West Africa: development of a modeling framework to inform vaccine trial design 95%
- Estimating the global demand curve for a leishmaniasis vaccine: a generalisable approach based on global burden of disease estimates 93%
- Spatiotemporal Variability in Dengue Transmission Intensity in Jakarta, Indonesia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling trachoma post 2020: Opportunities for mitigating the impact of COVID-19 and accelerating progress towards elimination 93%
- Modelling the impact of COVID-19-related programme interruptions on visceral leishmaniasis in India 93%
- What does the COVID-19 pandemic mean for the next decade of onchocerciasis control and elimination? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- India’S Pragmatic Vaccination Strategy Against COVID-19: A Mathematical Modelling Based Analysis 94%
- The acceptance of covid-19 vaccines in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from 6 national phone surveys 92%
- Rabies mortality and morbidity associated with animal bites in Africa: A case for Integrated Rabies Diseases Surveillance, Prevention and Control - A Scoping review 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.