Back

National burden and optimal vaccine policy for Japanese encephalitis virus in Bangladesh

Perez Duque, M.; Paul, K. K.; Sultana, R.; Ribeiro dos Santos, G.; O'Driscoll, M.; Naser, A. M.; Rahman, M.; Alam, M. S.; Al-Amin, H. M.; Rahman, M. Z.; Hossain, M. E.; Paul, R. C.; Krainski, E.; Luby, S. P.; Cauchemez, S.; Vanhomwegen, J.; Gurley, E. S.; Salje, H.

2025-07-07 public and global health
10.1101/2025.07.07.25330995 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBangladesh first reported Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) in 1977 and has seen regular cases since, however, no JEV vaccination program currently exists. A barrier to the use of JEV vaccines has been a limited understanding of the underlying burden. MethodsWe conducted a nationally representative serological community study in 70 communities in individuals of all ages (N=2,938, October 2015-January 2016). Serum samples were tested for IgG antibodies against JEV. We developed spatially explicit serocatalytic models to estimate the underlying force of infection across the country. We then used mathematical models to estimate the annual JE disease burden currently and under different vaccination strategies. FindingsThe overall JEV seroprevalence in Bangladesh was 3.4% (95%CI: 2.8-4.1, range 0-28% across communities). The annual probability of infection was 0.005 (95%CI: 0.003-0.009), with risk greatest near border regions. We estimated that annually there are 157 clinical cases (95%CI: 89-253) and 31 deaths (95%CI: 18-52). A vaccination strategy in the 10 most affected districts in 60% of 1-15 year olds would require 5 million doses and avert 1 case per 100,000 doses over five years compared to 35 million doses and 0.5 cases averted for a nationwide campaign. No vaccination scenario was cost-effective under a willingness-to-pay of three-times gross domestic product. InterpretationA spatially targeted vaccine campaign would be most effective in reducing JEV burden, however, would still not meet standard cost effectiveness targets. FundingCDC

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.