Calibrating CONSORT-AI with FAIR Principles to enhance reproducibility in AI-driven clinical trials
Shiferaw, K. B.; Balaur, I.; Collins, G.; Sharma, C.; Castro, L. J.; Psomopoulos, F.; Garijo, D.; Henkel, R.; Waltemath, D.; Zeleke, A. A.
Show abstract
AbstractArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical trials, yet poor reproducibility remains a critical barrier to trustworthy and transparent research. In this study, we propose a structured calibration of the CONSORT-AI reporting guideline using the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. We introduce the application of CALIFRAME, a framework designed to evaluate and align existing medical AI reporting standards with FAIR-compliant practices. Applying CALIFRAME to the CONSORT-AI checklist reveals specific gaps in data and code sharing, metadata use, and accessibility practices in current AI-driven clinical trials. Our results underscore the need for standardized metadata, clear licensing, and stakeholder-inclusive design in medical AI reporting. We demonstrate that FAIR- oriented calibration of reporting guidelines can bridge the reproducibility gap and support more transparent, efficient, and reusable AI interventions in healthcare. This work advocates for a shift toward reproducibility as a foundation for trustworthy AI in clinical research.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigator-initiated versus industry-sponsored trials – Visibility and relevance of randomized controlled trials in clinical practice guidelines (IMPACT) 95%
- Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Development, validation, and usage of metrics to evaluate clinical research hypothesis quality 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An interactive retrieval system for clinical trial studies with context-dependent protocol elements 96%
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 95%
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.