Back

Multiblock LASSO Framework for Cancer Gene Selection from RNA-Seq PANCAN Data

Ashraf, Z. A.; Aslam, M.; Mehmood, T.; Al-Essa, L. A. A.

2025-07-09 genetics
10.1101/2025.07.05.663323 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Cancer RNA-HiSeq PANCAN dataset consists of RNA-Seq gene expression data collected from multiple cancer types. It is a high-dimensional dataset, meaning it has thousands of gene expression features (predictors) and relatively fewer samples (observations). The dataset contains thousands of genes, making it difficult to identify key biomarkers. In order to reduce data and comprehend the modeled link, variable selection is essential. Least Regression using Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) is one modeling technique that deals with high throughput data. The data might be divided into different blocks representing different biological pathways or cancer types. Many genes are correlated, which can reduce interpretability. In many areas, including modern biology, variable selection is an important problem. For instance, choosing genetic characteristics for categorization (i.e., identifying harmful bacteria, diagnosing diseases, etc.) is an example of this. Multiblock Lasso (a variant of Lasso regression) is particularly useful when data is structured into blocks (e.g., different biological processes or pathways). It helps in selecting important features across multiple blocks, improving interpretability by grouping related genes, reducing over fitting in high-dimensional datasets. In this study, we apply Multiblock Lasso to extract significant gene features for cancer classification. We preprocess the dataset, define block structures using biological pathways, and optimize the regularization parameters using cross-validation. Experimental results demonstrate that Multiblock Lasso effectively reduces dimensionality while maintaining classification accuracy, making it a powerful tool for biomarker discovery in cancer genomics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.