Structure from Noise: Confirmation Bias in Particle Picking in Structural Biology
Balanov, A.; Zabatani, A.; Bendory, T.
Show abstract
Confirmation bias is a fundamental challenge in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET), where prior expectations can lead to systematic errors in data interpretation. This bias may emerge at multiple stages of the reconstruction pipeline, and in particular in the critical particle-picking stage, where 2D particles (in cryo-EM) or 3D subtomograms (in cryo-ET) are extracted from highly noisy micrographs or tomograms. Focusing on two widely used methodologies, template matching and deep neural networks, we combine theoretical analysis with controlled experiments to demonstrate that both methods, when applied to pure noise, can produce persistent molecular structures, a phenomenon we term structure from noise. This artifact highlights a critical vulnerability in current workflows: the potential for particle-picking algorithms to inject strong prior-driven bias into downstream analyses. We then propose practical mitigation strategies to reduce the impact of such biases. Together, our findings deepen the theoretical understanding of confirmation bias in cryo-EM and cryo-ET and call for cautious interpretation of reconstructions, primarily when relying on template-driven particle picking.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- 3D Variability Analysis: Resolving continuous flexibility and discrete heterogeneity from single particle cryo-EM 98%
- ProPicker: Promptable Segmentation for Particle Picking in CryogenicElectron Tomography 95%
- CryoSamba: self-supervised deep volumetric denoising for cryo-electron tomography data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.