Back

Flexible foraging effort shapes Adelie penguin reproductive success across Antarctica and sea ice conditions

Barracho, T.; Bardon, G.; Houstin, A.; Beaulieu, M.; Blanchard, P.; Cristofari, R.; Lenourry, L.; Raclot, T.; Tabillon, C.; Zitterbart, D.; Lecomte, N.; Le Bohec, C.

2025-07-09 ecology
10.1101/2025.07.05.663228 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how species deal with diverse environmental conditions is crucial for predicting their future responses to climate change. In Antarctica, changing sea ice dynamics threaten ice-dependent species. Whilebehavioural adjustmentscould help mitigate these threats, their effectiveness under future environmental conditions and potential thresholds remain unclear. Long-term studies and circumpolar approaches could address this challenge. Our 15-year study (2010-2024) of over 23,000 foraging trips from Adelie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) in East Antarctica, identified a non-linear relationship between sea ice concentration (SIC) and foraging effort when landfast ice was absent, a situation anticipated to define the species future habitat during chick-rearing. Minimal effort occurred at 10-20% SIC, but more than doubled with the presence of landfast ice or heavy pack-ice, with females showing greater sensitivity to these ice changes. Acircumpolar analysis of similar data demonstrated that foraging effort during chick-guarding predicted reproductive success across ten Adelie penguin populations. Reproductive success remained high until foraging trips exceeded approximately 29 hours, after which performance declined sharply. This indicates that while behavioural flexibility can buffer against moderate environmental changes, it has clear limits. Our findings establish foraging trip duration as a valuable early warning indicator for population responses to environmental change.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.