Protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on nutritional interventions in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder
Soldevila-Matias, P.; Sanchez-Orti, J. V.; Correa-Ghisays, P.; Balanza-Martinez, V.; Saint-Gerons, D. M.; Fuentes-Dura, I.; Tabares-Seisdedos, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic mental health condition, and standard treatment often results in incomplete symptom relief. Growing evidence suggests that nutritional supplements, including vitamins, minerals, and amino acids, may serve as potential adjunctive treatments for OCD by influencing neurotransmitter regulation and inflammation. Our systematic review aims to assess the comparative efficacy of nutritional supplements on relevant clinical outcomes in individuals with OCD. Methods/designA protocol was developed and registered for this systematic review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of nutritional supplementation compared with standard treatments (pharmacological and psychological interventions) will be included. Primary outcomes are changes in cognitive performance, quality of life, and psychiatric symptoms. Secondary outcomes include the presence of comorbidities or multimorbidities (e.g., metabolic syndrome). Systematic searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception onward. Two independent researchers will screen the citations and full-text articles. The risk of bias and study quality will be evaluated using validated tools, and association measures with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Potential sources of heterogeneity will also be analyzed. DiscussionWe aim to address the gaps in the current treatment paradigm for OCD by evaluating the efficacy of nutritional supplementation as an adjunctive therapy. These findings may provide insights into the potential of these supplements to improve cognitive and psychiatric outcomes. This protocol establishes a foundation for the rigorous synthesis of available evidence, which may inform future clinical practices and support the integration of nutritional strategies in OCD management. Systematic review registrationOpen Science Framework [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NZ5MU]
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Interventions Promoting Recovery from Depression for Patients Transitioning from Outpatient Mental Health Services to Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review 94%
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanisms linking physical activity with psychiatric symptoms: a protocol for a systematic review 95%
- Side effect profile and comparative tolerability of newer generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis 93%
- Individual participant data systematic reviews with meta-analyses of psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder: A protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased atherogenicity in mood disorders: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression 92%
- Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with evidence-based psychotherapy for psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis of optimal implementation parameters 91%
- Problematic usage of the internet and eating disorders: a multifaceted, systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased neurotoxicity due to activated immune-inflammatory and nitro-oxidative stress pathways in patients with suicide attempts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 93%
- Oral Ketamine for the Treatment of Depression: A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis 91%
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of mental health illness in Nigeria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.