Back

Protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on nutritional interventions in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder

Soldevila-Matias, P.; Sanchez-Orti, J. V.; Correa-Ghisays, P.; Balanza-Martinez, V.; Saint-Gerons, D. M.; Fuentes-Dura, I.; Tabares-Seisdedos, R.

2025-07-06 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.07.05.25330936 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic mental health condition, and standard treatment often results in incomplete symptom relief. Growing evidence suggests that nutritional supplements, including vitamins, minerals, and amino acids, may serve as potential adjunctive treatments for OCD by influencing neurotransmitter regulation and inflammation. Our systematic review aims to assess the comparative efficacy of nutritional supplements on relevant clinical outcomes in individuals with OCD. Methods/designA protocol was developed and registered for this systematic review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of nutritional supplementation compared with standard treatments (pharmacological and psychological interventions) will be included. Primary outcomes are changes in cognitive performance, quality of life, and psychiatric symptoms. Secondary outcomes include the presence of comorbidities or multimorbidities (e.g., metabolic syndrome). Systematic searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception onward. Two independent researchers will screen the citations and full-text articles. The risk of bias and study quality will be evaluated using validated tools, and association measures with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Potential sources of heterogeneity will also be analyzed. DiscussionWe aim to address the gaps in the current treatment paradigm for OCD by evaluating the efficacy of nutritional supplementation as an adjunctive therapy. These findings may provide insights into the potential of these supplements to improve cognitive and psychiatric outcomes. This protocol establishes a foundation for the rigorous synthesis of available evidence, which may inform future clinical practices and support the integration of nutritional strategies in OCD management. Systematic review registrationOpen Science Framework [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NZ5MU]

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.