Back

Network-Based Stratification Refines Stratification of Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Samples

Srivastava, A.; Saad, J.; Sergeev, P.; Vaha-Koskela, M. J. V.; Deeg, J. H.; Radich, J.; Park, K.; Heckman, C. A.; Woo, J.

2025-07-05 oncology
10.1101/2025.07.04.25330879 medRxiv
Show abstract

The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) uses genetic and molecular markers to categorize patients. However, disease heterogeneity, particularly in the intermediate-risk group, complicates stratification. Ideker et al. developed the Network-Based Stratification (NBS) method, combining protein network analysis and mutation profiling via machine learning. We applied NBS to intermediate- risk AML patients to refine prognosis and identify distinct molecular subtypes compared to the 2022 ELN scheme. We selected 170 intermediate-risk AML patients based on the 2022 ELN classification from TCGA (n=58), BEAT AML (n=87), and FIMM (n=25) datasets. Using NBS, we analyzed 3,108 genes from WGS or WES data, mapping them onto a cancer-specific protein network for clustering based on network-propagated mutation profiles. We conducted 200 iterations of sub-sampling, considering patients with at least 3 mutated genes and using consensus clustering for robust stratification, assessing associations with clinical and transcriptomic features. NBS identified five distinct molecular subgroups characterized by unique mutation patterns: IDH1-dominant (Cluster 1), DNMT3A-dominant (Cluster 2), low-frequency multi-mutated (Cluster 3), FLT3/NPM1/DNMT3A co- mutated (Cluster 4), and FLT3-dominant (Cluster 5). Cluster 4 showed significantly worse overall survival (HR = 1.81; p = 0.05). In addition, ex vivo drug sensitivity and transcriptomic analyses revealed significant variation in therapeutic response and pathway activation across clusters. These findings underscore the power of machine learning-driven approaches like NBS to uncover hidden molecular structure within intermediate-risk AML groups, enabling more precise prognostication and potentially informing personalized therapeutic strategies. Key pointsO_LIML-based NBS stratification reveals distinct subgroups within intermediate-risk AML with unique molecular and clinical profiles. C_LIO_LIAML with NPM1/FLT3-ITD/DNMT3A mutations define a high-risk group with distinct drug sensitivities, including FLT3 inhibitors. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 11%
14.3%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
4
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
5
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
7
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.4%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.1%
14
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
15
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%