Back

Transient Poly(ADP-Ribose) Triggers FUS Condensation Hysteresis via a Prion-Like Mechanism

Liu, H.; Cai, Y.; Shi, L.; Pillai, M.; Das, N.; Tarbox, H. E.; Ge, Y.; Yue, K.; Yang, X.; Rath, P.; Badiee, M.; Fabilane, C. S.; Spangler, J. B.; Bedford, M. T.; Myong, S.; Fried, S. D.; Ding, X.; Leung, A. K. L.

2025-07-05 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.03.659157 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hysteresis--where a system retains memory of a transient stimulus--is common in signaling but can also arise in intracellular organization. DNA repair foci, a type of biomolecular condensate, are initiated by the short-lived noncanonical nucleic acid poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR). PAR recruits proteins with prion-like domains (PrLDs), such as Fused in Sarcoma (FUS), and initiates their condensation, which persists even after PAR degradation. How FUS transitions from PAR-dependent to PAR-independent condensation remains unclear. Here, we show that PAR binding triggers a conformational switch in FUS, enabling sustained condensation. PAR binds to the C-terminal arginine-rich region of FUS, displacing intramolecular contacts, and exposing the N-terminal PrLD. This conformational opening allows PrLD interactions in trans, stabilizing condensates independently of PAR. FUS thus undergoes a regulated, nucleated conformational conversion--reminiscent of classical prions. This mechanism implies a paradigm of nucleic acid-induced conformational memory that may underlie hysteresis in intracellular organization in health and disease. HIGHLIGHTS[bullet] PAR-initiated FUS condensation follows a bi-modular mechanism involving both FUS termini. [bullet]Simulations predict and experiments confirm PAR disrupts FUS intramolecular contacts. [bullet]Upon condensation, FUS adopts a conformation with its N-terminus open for interactions. [bullet]N-terminal interactions maintain FUS condensation when PAR degrades during DNA repair.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.