How many calories are in our food? Compliance with England's calorie labelling regulations three years after policy implementation
Huse, O.; Kalbus, A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo assess compliance with Englands calorie labelling regulations in the out-of-home (OOH) food sector. MethodsData were collected from websites of large UK OOH food outlets. Descriptive analysis of compliance with the calorie labelling regulations was conducted, particularly i) whether the default menu, i.e. the first menu a consumer is likely to see, shows calories, ii) whether implementation guidance relating to label visibility and statement of daily calorie needs were followed, and iii) whether compliance varied by business type. ResultsWhile all outlets (n=77) provided calorie labelling somewhere on their websites, just under half (48%) did not provide calorie labels on the default menu, requiring additional steps to view a labelled menu. Compliance with the policys guidance was greatest for the labels position (81%) and lowest for prominent formatting (40%), while 71% provided the statement of daily calorie needs. Differences between OOH outlet types were observed but not tested owing to the small sample size. ConclusionsOur results suggest that OOH food outlets are finding ways to circumvent the calorie labelling regulations, thus undermining the policys impact. As the policys review is approaching, policymakers should consider strategies for ensuring compliance. Plain Language Title and SummaryO_ST_ABSAssessing how well food businesses in England are following Calorie labelling laws requiring them to show Calorie information on menusC_ST_ABSTo address the rising prevalence of diet-related disease, the English government introduced mandatory calorie labelling on the menus of restaurants and other large food outlets. This study looked at how well food outlets in England are following the rules about showing calorie information on their menus. Researchers checked the websites of 77 large food outlets in the UK to see if they were adhering to the calorie labelling laws. They focused on three main things: O_LIWhether the first menu a customer sees (the "default menu") clearly shows calorie information. C_LIO_LIWhether the calorie labels are easy to see and include a reminder about how many calories a typical adult needs in a day. C_LIO_LIWhether certain types of food businesses are adhering to the law better than others. C_LI Although all 77 businesses did include calorie information somewhere on their websites, nearly half of them (48%) did not show calories on the first menu customers would see. Instead, customers had to click through extra steps to find the calorie-labelled menu, which could discourage them from using it. Most businesses (81%) put calorie information in the correct location on the menu, but only 40% made it clearly visible with easy-to-read formatting. About 71% of businesses correctly included the reminder that adults need around 2,000 calories per day. Different types of food businesses were following the rules to varying degrees, but the sample size was too small to draw firm conclusions. Overall, the study suggests that many food businesses are not fully following the calorie labelling laws, and some may be doing the minimum to technically comply while making it harder for customers to access calorie information. As the government reviews this policy, better enforcement mechanisms are needed to ensure that businesses comply with the regulations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of a mandatory calorie labelling policy in out-of-home food outlets in England on consumer behaviour: a natural experimental study 97%
- A mixed methods study evaluating food insecurity and diet quality in households accessing food aid in England 96%
- Home Food Procurement Impacts Food Security and Diet Quality during COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between out of home food sector outlet menu healthiness scores, menu characteristics and energy consumed by customers in 2021-2022 96%
- Effects of food-related odors on eating behavior: A systematic review 90%
- Evidence for a protein leverage effect on food intake but not on body mass index in a Norwegian population 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and enforcement of mandatory calorie labelling regulations for the out-of-home sector in England: qualitative study of the experiences of business implementers and regulatory enforcers 97%
- Weight-normative messaging predominates on TikTok – a qualitative content analysis 93%
- Sodium content of menu items in New York City chain restaurants following enforcement of the sodium warning icon rule, 2015-2017 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining the associations between the food environment and dietary intake in British Columbia: A cross-sectional study 93%
- Wearable Sensing in Eating Episode Monitoring: An Updated Systematic Review Protocol 91%
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-reported decreases in the purchases of selected unhealthy foods resulting from the implementation of warning labels in Mexican youth and adult population 94%
- The impact of deprivation and neighbourhood food environments on home food environments, parental feeding practices, and child eating behaviours, food preferences and BMI: The Family Food Experience Study-London 92%
- Exploring the changing association between parental and adolescent fruit and vegetable intakes, from age 10 to 30 years 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.