Social vulnerability to health impacts of climate change in Australia: understanding dimensions, drivers, and health inequality
Li, A.; Toll, M.; Martino, E.; Gibbs, L.; McNicol, E.; Mason, K.; Bentley, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundA limited ability to identify social vulnerability and community resilience at local scales has been recognised as a critical barrier to both climate adaptation and health risk assessment and planning. This study aims to assess multidimensional social vulnerability to the health impacts of climate change across communities in Australia, quantify its contribution to health inequalities, and identify key drivers of health vulnerability. MethodsInformed by a scoping review and the WHO Social Determinants of Health Equity framework, we compiled area-level data from multiple sources on 61 social vulnerability indicators, subsumed under 27 subdomains and 8 domains (demographic profile, economic security, residential environment, infrastructure and services, social stability and community support, population health, governance and policies, climate knowledge and awareness). These indicators were used to construct a Social Vulnerability Index for the Health Impact of Climate Change (SVI-HICC) and scores in each domain. We used dominance analyses to identify the strongest predictors of vulnerability, examined inequalities in mental, physical, and social health associated with extreme weather and climate events across the vulnerability distribution, and tested the capacity of SVI-HICC to predict adverse health outcomes following climate-related extreme events in comparison to alternative social indices. FindingsSpatial mapping showed that high vulnerability was clustered in regional and remote areas, with pockets of moderate vulnerability in urban areas. People living in high vulnerability areas experienced significant health losses from weather and climate disaster, this was not seen for people in low vulnerability areas. Infrastructure and services, economic security, and residential environment were identified as the most influential domains contributing to social vulnerability, primarily driven by access to healthcare services, area disadvantage, dwelling condition, and housing precarity. InterpretationAn area-level assessment of multi-dimensional social vulnerability makes visible how social and structural determinants contribute to health inequalities in climate change. Such insights can inform climate adaptation policies that are equity-oriented and context-sensitive.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Urban greenspace and anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: A 20-month follow up of 19,848 participants in England 92%
- Assessing the risk of endogeneity bias in health and mortality inequalities research using composite measures of multiple deprivation which include health-related indicators: A case study using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation and population health and mortality data 90%
- Continuing inequalities in COVID-19 mortality in England and Wales, and the changing importance of regional, over local, deprivation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of a sanitation intervention on quality of life and mental wellbeing in low-income urban neighbourhoods of Maputo, Mozambique 91%
- Seasonality and predictors of childhood stunting and wasting in drought-prone areas in Ethiopia: A cohort study 91%
- The Health Effects of Climate Change: An Overview of Systematic Reviews 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of social and environmental extremes on cholera time varying reproduction number in Nigeria 93%
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 92%
- Architecture of systems affecting disease trajectories in a conflict zone: A community-centered systems inquiry in North Gaza 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Household Hardships during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Examining Household Vulnerability and Responses to Pandemic Related Shocks in Eastern Ethiopia 91%
- Scarlet Fever and Meteorological Exposures in Jiangsu, China: A Time-stratified Case-crossover Study 90%
- A comparative national-level analysis of government food system resilience activities in preparation for future food system disruptions 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health equity impacts of climate change in the UK: a rapid systematic review and interactive evidence gap map 93%
- Intersecting vulnerabilities: Climatic and demographic contributions to future population exposure to Aedes-borne viruses in the United States 90%
- Land-use change from food to energy: meta-analysis unravels effects of bioenergy on biodiversity and amenity 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.