Back

An inducible tethered function assay reveals differential regulatory effects for the RNA-binding protein YBX3 and its domains.

Skipper, W.; Mehta, D.; Adler, J.; Rose, N.; Johnson, I.; Bressman, Z. J.; Sheets, M. D.; Cooke, A.

2025-07-02 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.02.662812 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA-binding protein (RBP) regulation is widespread across biology from development to learning and memory. Often RBPs contain multiple modular domains, which contribute to distinct RNA- binding activity or interactions necessary for regulation. However, assays to determine specific regulatory activity of individual domains are limited. The tethered function assay (TFA) provides a direct method to assess the functional activity of RBPs and their domains. The assay consists of two key components: (i) a reporter plasmid that encodes an mRNA, such as luciferase or GFP, engineered with high-affinity binding sites for an exogenous RNA-binding factor, and (ii) an effector construct that expresses a chimera of the RBP fused to the RNA-binding factor. Co- transfection of these constructs allows for measurement of reporter activity as a quantitative readout for RBP regulatory function. We developed an inducible TFA (iTFA) system through generation of a stable inducible mammalian cell line to express a reporter mRNA encoding nanoluciferase (nLuc) with six high-affinity MS2 binding sites within its 3 untranslated region. These cells can be transfected with a single plasmid that expresses an RBP fused to the MS2 coat protein. This approach enhances efficiency and reproducibility through reduction of transfection burden to a single plasmid and simplified normalization. We used this platform to dissect the individual and combined regulatory effects of YBX3 domains, a modular RBP with differential regulatory activity. The iTFA system provides a streamlined, tunable platform for functional analysis of RBPs that facilitates rapid interrogation of RBP or domain-specific activities in mammalian cells.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.