Back

The complex interaction between megaherbivores, climate and fire has shaped the evolution and distribution of plant spinescence across biogeographical realms

Souza Ferreira, R.; Ringelberg, J.; Hughes, C.; Arle, E.; Woelke, F.; Tomlinson, K.; Onstein, R.

2025-07-05 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.07.02.662719 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIThe evolutionary arms race between plants and herbivores has led to numerous plant adaptations, including spinescence. However, whether spinescence evolved primarily in response to herbivory, or whether abiotic conditions also played a role, remains unknown. C_LIO_LIWe integrated phylogenetic, geographic, and trait data for 2,686 species of an ecologically diverse and spiny pantropical lineage - mimosoid legumes - with data for 235 extant and 185 extinct mammalian herbivores >10 kg. Using structural equation models, we assessed how herbivores, climate and fire directly and indirectly affected the proportion of spinescent mimosoids across global and continental assemblages. C_LIO_LIThe proportion of spinescent mimosoids in assemblages increased with extant and extinct herbivore richness, drought and heat, while fire influenced spinescence indirectly, by affecting herbivore richness. Notably, correlations of spinescence differed between Africa and America, with increasing importance of extinct herbivores in Africa, illustrating legacy effects on spinescence. C_LIO_LIMegaherbivores have shaped spinescence in mimosoids, especially in dry environments, where losing plant tissues is costly. Spinescence originated [~]35 Mya, with the transition of mimosoids to seasonally dry environments, pre-dating the Miocene expansion of savannas. Our study suggests that both long-term climatic transitions and the emergence of open, herbivore-rich landscapes played crucial roles in the evolution and distribution of spinescence. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.