Back

Differential Diagnosis of Image Discovered Small Pulmonary Nodules (SPN): A Real-World Study

Zheng, R.; Lai, Y.; Huang, J.; Xu, N.; Zhang, H.; Xie, J.; Li, H.

2025-07-03 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2025.07.02.25330729 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe present investigation explored the disease spectrum of SPN ([&le;]2cm) and attempted to establish the potential predictive models for non-benign small pulmonary nodules (NBSPN) identified from CT screening in a real-world perspective study. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 6166 patients with SPN detected via chest CT scans at Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital from January 2017 to September 2022. R language and SPSS software were used for data analyses. ResultsOf the 6,166 patients with SPN, 954 (15.47%) had their diagnosis confirmed pathologically. Among these nodules, NBSPN accounted for 88.7%. In NBSPN, the precursor glandular lesion (PGL) accounted for 14.18%, including 5.83% with atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) and 94.17% with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) accounted for 85.82%, of which 32.07% were microinvasive adenocarcinoma (MIAD) and 67.93% invasive adenocarcinoma (IAD). Using the ROC model, none of the classical clinical factors had predictive value to the nature of SPN, including age, smoking, underlying conditions, CEA level, family history etc. Interestingly, the risk factors for NBSPN predicted by the ROC model include: female (OR: 1.842, 95%CI: 1.086-3.125, P=0.024), pure ground-glass opacities(pGGO) (OR: 5.243, 95%CI: 2.640-10.411, P<0.001), and part-solid (PS) (OR: 5.643, 95%CI: 1.970-16.167, P=0.001) in chest imaging, collectively delivering a highly significant AUC value at 0.748 in training set and 0.799 in validation set for distinguishing NBSPN from BSPN. ConclusionConventional clinical data are not sufficient to differentiate NBSPN from BSPN. Factors with high predictive values for NBSPN include female, pGGO and PS.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.