Neural trajectories improve motor precision
Lee, W.-H.; Scherschligt, X.; Nishimoto, M.; Rouse, A. G.
Show abstract
Populations of neurons in motor cortex signal voluntary movement. Most classic neural encoding models and current brain-computer interface decoders assume individual neurons sum together along a neural dimension to represent movement features such as velocity or force. However, large population neural analyses continue to identify trajectories of neural activity evolving with time that traverse multiple dimensions. Explanations for these neural trajectories typically focus on how cortical circuits learn, organize, and implement movements. However, descriptions of how these neural trajectories might improve performance, and specifically motor precision, are lacking. In this study, we proposed and tested a computational model that highlights the role of neural trajectories, through the selective co-activation and selective timing of firing rates across the neural populations, for improving motor precision. Our model uses experimental results from a center-out reaching task as inspiration to create several physiologically realistic models for the neural encoding of movement. Using a recurrent neural network to simulate how a downstream population of neurons might receive such information, like the spinal cord and motor units, we show that movements are more accurate when neural information specific to the phase and/or amplitude of movement are incorporated across time instead of an instantaneous, linear tuning model. Our finding suggests that precise motor control arises from spatiotemporal recruitment of neural populations that create distinct neural trajectories. We anticipate our results will significantly impact not only how neural encoding of movement in motor cortex is described but also future understating for how brain networks communicate information for planning and executing movements. Our model also provides potential inspiration for how to incorporate selective activation across a neural population to improve future brain-computer interfaces. SummaryScientists have long studied how neurons in the brain help control movement. Traditionally, individual neurons were assumed to simply add together to create a signal to represent things like speed or force. But newer research shows that groups of neurons follow complex patterns over time--called neural trajectories. Here, we propose a computer model demonstrating how neural trajectories would enhance the precision of movement. Inspired by data from actual neurons recorded during a reaching task, we simulated neurons in motor areas of the brain and a downstream neural network to interpret and generate movement like might occur in our spinal cord and muscles. Movements were more accurate when neurons had different activations and timings relative to the desired movement rather than all working synchronously to generate a single signal. We conclude that the brain uses timing and coordination across many neurons-- not just simple signals--to control movement. This work refines our understanding of how the brain signals movement and could improve technologies like brain-computer interfaces, which help people move or communicate using their thoughts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Unsupervised, piecewise linear decoding enables an accurate prediction of muscle activity in a multi-task brain computer interface 96%
- Estimating muscle activation from EMG using deep learning-based dynamical systems models 94%
- Decoding multi-limb movements from low temporal resolution calcium imaging using deep learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The spinal cord facilitates cerebellar upper limb motor learning and control; inputs from neuromusculoskeletal simulation 95%
- A neurocomputational theory of action regulation predicts motor behavior in neurotypical individuals and patients with Parkinsons disease 94%
- A Recurrent Neural Network Model for Flexible and Adaptive Decision Making based on Sequence Learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- MotorNet: a Python toolbox for controlling differentiable biomechanical effectors with artificial neural networks 96%
- Inferring control objectives in a virtual balancing task in humans and monkeys 95%
- High-fidelity Musculoskeletal Modeling Reveals a Motor Planning Contribution to the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaption along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches 95%
- Prediction and final temporal errors are used for trial-to-trial motor corrections 94%
- Mirror Neurons are Modulated by Grip Force and Reward Expectation in the Sensorimotor Cortices (S1, M1, PMd, PMv) 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.