Back

Neurological Tissue Dissection Techniques in Mouse Models for Reproducible Scientific Results: Brain, Spinal Cord, CSF, and Sciatic Nerve

Crew, L.; Seerley, A.; McElroy, S.; Panter, A. G.

2025-07-02 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.07.01.662633 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biomedical research studies, specifically regarding human neurodegenerative diseases, are bound by ethical challenges, and have limited diagnostic and treatment options. Transgenic mouse models offer an incredible research advantage to conduct feasible and practical research with the ability to precisely define the progression of neurodegenerative disease over a wellcontrolled dosage and timeline. The use of transgenic mouse models has been extensive and is critical to advancing research in many ways, including understanding brain morphology and general tissue changes caused by neurological diseases. Often, these studies require specific brain regions or other neurological tissues which may be difficult to obtain. Unfortunately, specific extraction and dissection protocols are few and far between, leading to inconsistent results and a lack of reproducibility. A well-defined protocol, such as this, is instrumental in overcoming these obstacles and acquiring better experimental results. Five mouse-specific protocols are described: brain extraction, brain microdissection, spinal cord extrusion, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) collection, and sciatic nerve dissection. Each protocol was completed under biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) guidelines, similar to the sterility precautions required in human surgery. Each protocol also includes a collective materials list that defines proper instruments and usage. The protocol was refined based on feedback from numerous research studies in transcriptomics and pharmaceutical development. These applications require minimizing tissue damage, dissection accuracy, and the ability to reproduce the results--skills that are also directly transferable to clinical settings. The proper implementation of these protocols will allow for more accurate and precise results with reduced variability. This study provides well-defined, succinct, accessible protocols that are more ethical and improve the overall quality of the conducted research. By addressing this need, it supports greater advancements in many cross disciplinary areas.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
3
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
9
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
22
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%