Back

Exploration of chemical probes and conformational flexibility of GID4 - the substrate receptor of human CTLH E3 ligase complex

Kotlarek, D.; Dudek, K.; Pokladek, Z.; Pastok, M. W.; Shishov, D.; Cottens, S.; Bista, M.; Krzywiecka, E.; Gorecka-Minakowska, K.; Jurczak, K.; Drmota, T.; Adamczyk, J.; Falinski, S. P.; Gajewska, D.; Klejnot, M.; Krol, A.; Cuprych-Belter, M.; Mames, I.; Mathieu, A.; Podkowka, A.; Przytulski, K.; Skowron, A. N.; Sypien, M.; Takagi, T.; Wanat, W.; Wierzbicki, I. H.; Wisniewski, J.; Szlachcic, A.; Wozniak, B.; Walczak, M. J.

2025-07-04 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.01.662521 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The application of targeted protein degradation (TPD) is currently constrained by the limited availability of low-molecular-weight molecules that can recruit E3 ligases other than CRBN (Cereblon) or VHL (Von Hippel-Lindau ligase). In this study, we present the structure-based drug design (SBDD) of high-affinity ligands that engage E3 ligase GID4 (Glucose-induced degradation protein 4) in biophysical and cellular experiments. Through structural studies and molecular modeling, we identified three clusters of compounds that induce distinct conformations of GID4. We characterized potential exit vectors and used the most promising ligand as a building block to prepare bifunctional degraders in the form of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs). Although ternary complex formation was successful in vitro, degradation of BRD4 was not observed, highlighting the need for further optimization of the degraders. Finally, we theoretically investigated the likelihood of the identified GID4 conformations participating in protein-protein interactions mediated by molecular glue mechanisms. We believe the expanded ligand diversity discovered in this study may pave the way for tuning the selectivity and efficacy of interactions involving GID4 and its neosubstrates. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=61 SRC="FIGDIR/small/662521v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (18K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19187e8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@171abd1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c75a5forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fe17fc_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
ChemMedChem
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.0%
4
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
5
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
7
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
9
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
11
Angewandte Chemie
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
14
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
21
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
25
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
ACS Catalysis
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%