Back

Epithelial brushing storage conditions and the reliability of IF staining - implications for primary ciliary dyskinesia diagnostics

Przystalowska-Maciola, H.; Dabrowska, M.; Zietkiewicz, E.; Bukowy-Bieryllo, Z.

2025-07-02 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2025.07.01.25330648
Show abstract

Immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy is gaining increased popularity as a pre-genetic diagnostic method in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). Efficient IF-based diagnostics in PCD requires standardization of staining methods and antibodies. Obviously, specificity of the analysis highly depends on the quality of the analyzed material. The nasal epithelium brushing quality depends on the patient health status, but conditions of the slides storage are also very important. We applied automated image analysis to systematically examine the influence of samples storage conditions on the specificity of IF staining with eight polyclonal antibodies routinely used for PCD diagnostics, against epitopes of proteins representing various axoneme structural complexes. Seven various combinations of temperatures and storage times were tested to mimic the procedures of handling epithelial brushing on glass slides: at the clinic, during transport, or after reception at the diagnostic laboratory. Our study revealed that proper slide storage conditions are essential for the reliable PCD diagnosis via IF staining. If microscopic slides are prepared at the diagnostic laboratory, we suggest continuous storage at -80{degrees}C or -20{degrees}C. If the slides are prepared at a collaborating clinic and shipped, we suggest storage at -20{degrees}C or 4{degrees}C. The IF sensitivity to slide storage conditions differs among antibodies targeting various ciliary elements; for example, molecular ruler proteins appear the most sensitive to prolonged slide storage at room temperature. Moreover, to improve the reliability of the IF staining, additional control slides should be used to account for inter-individual differences. Finally, IF results indicative of PCD should be carefully confronted with patients clinical history.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 12%
11.2%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 46%
11.1%
3
Respiratory Research
based on 10 papers
Top 0.2%
7.6%
4
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 1%
5.3%
6
ERJ Open Research
based on 36 papers
Top 0.8%
4.7%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 0.8%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
10
Frontiers in Pediatrics
based on 24 papers
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Clinical and Translational Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
2.3%
12
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.7%
2.3%
13
Pediatric Pulmonology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.7%
1.8%
14
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
based on 10 papers
Top 0.5%
1.6%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 12%
1.3%
16
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
18
EMBO Molecular Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
19
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
based on 23 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Annals of Translational Medicine
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
21
The Lancet Microbe
based on 33 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 14%
0.8%
24
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 41%
0.8%
26
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
29
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
based on 15 papers
Top 0.7%
0.8%