Back

MiniMORPH: A Morphometry Pipeline for Low-Field MRI in Infants

Casella, C.; Leknes, A.; Bourke, N. J.; Zahra, A.; Scheiene, D. E.; Kyriakopoulou, V.; Williams, S. R.; Bradford, L. E.; Murungi, J.; Williams, S. C. R.; Deoni, S.; Nankabirwa, V.; Donald, K. A.; Bruchhage, M. M. K.; O'Muircheartaigh, J.

2025-07-03 public and global health
10.1101/2025.07.01.25330469 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUltra-low-field (ULF) MRI facilitates neuroimaging access, yet its application in early infancy is constrained by low resolution/contrast, and the limited suitability of existing segmentation tools. ObjectiveWe present miniMORPH, an open-source pipeline for infant brain volumetry from 0.064T T2-weighted MRI scans. We evaluate its performance across multiple sites and ages and validate findings against high-field (HF) segmentations. MethodsULF scans were acquired from infants (2 to 27 months) across two cohorts in South Africa and Uganda. Age-specific templates and priors from established neurodevelopmental atlases were used to delineate brain tissues and substructures. Reliability was assessed by examining age, sex, and birthweight effects, and by comparing volumes to those from matched HF scans. ResultsminiMORPH successfully segmented major brain regions, capturing age-related growth trajectories. Sex-dependent volumetric differences were widespread but attenuated after intracranial volume correction. Low birthweight infants exhibited reduced regional volumes and altered growth trajectories. ULF-HF comparison showed strong correlations in most structures, although systematic biases were observed in ventricular estimates. Performance varied by age, with greatest segmentation deviation at 3 months. ConclusionminiMORPH enables reliable volumetric analysis of ULF infant MRI. Its compatibility with ULF systems supports equitable global neurodevelopmental research. The pipeline is openly available at https://github.com/UNITY-Physics/fw-minimorph.

Published in Human Brain Mapping (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.