High-resolution cryo-EM structures of small protein-ligand complexes near the theoretical size limit
Park, K.; Yoo, Y.; Jeon, H.; Choi, K.; Kwon, E.; Lim, H.-H.; Kim, D. Y.; No, K. T.
10.1101/2025.06.30.662489 bioRxivShow abstract
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is widely used to determine macromolecular structures at atomic resolution. The theoretical size lower limit of particles for cryo-EM analysis is 38 kDa, limited by factors such as contrast and particle alignment accuracy. To date, no cryo-EM structures have been reported for proteins near this size limit. This study presents cryo-EM structures of two protein-ligand complexes around 40 kDa. The structure of maltose-binding protein (43 kDa) was determined at 2.32 [A] resolution, clearly revealing the bound maltose and water molecules. Additionally, the kinase domain of human PLK1 (37 kDa), slightly below the theoretical limit, was determined at 3.04 [A] resolution, allowing the identification of the bound ligand, onvansertib. These findings demonstrate that cryo-EM can be effectively employed for structure determination and structure-based drug screening of small proteins or domains.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DomainFit: Identification of Protein Domains in cryo-EM maps at Intermediate Resolution using AlphaFold2-predicted Models 95%
- Lipids modulate open probability of RyR1 under cryo-EM conditions 95%
- Single-particle cryo-EM analysis of the shell architecture and internal organization of an intact α-carboxysome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The cryo-EM structure of the bacterial flagellum cap complex suggests a molecular mechanism for filament elongation. 95%
- Structural Insight into Mitochondrial Beta-Barrel Outer Membrane Protein Biogenesis 95%
- The biosynthesis of the odorant 2-methylisoborneol is compartmentalized inside a protein shell 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.