The Role of Signal in Producing Saltatory Approach to Cryptic Stationary Targets
Forbes, E.; Todd, P. M.; Beer, R. D.
Show abstract
Saltatory movement strategies in animal search are well known, but their role in pursuit and localization of targets is less so. There are multiple features of forager-target interactions that may generate saltatory forager movement during pursuit and/or localization of the target. Here, we explore how the reliability of the targets signal and the dependence of the foragers perception of that signal on the foragers own motion can generate a variety of different continuous and saltatory pursuit patterns in evolved model foragers with stationary targets. We use dynamical analyses of evolved forager nervous systems to show the possible mechanisms through which saltatory movement was generated and how signals influence those movements in a foraging animal. Saltatory movement during pursuit independent of signal was routinely found when the foragers perception depended on its movement. Saltatory movement patterns could also be generated in otherwise cruise-like behaviors when target signal either excited or inhibited ongoing forager movement. Additionally, the magnitude of the signals influence was found to depend on proximity to the target during pursuit. These models present hypotheses for future empirical research and emphasize the importance of exploring variation in animal movement during different phases of foraging.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- How do backward walking ants (Cataglyphis velox) cope with navigational uncertainty? 95%
- Changes in movement characteristics in response to private and social information acquisition of socially foraging fish 93%
- Copy when uncertain: Lower light levels result in higher trail pheromone deposition and stronger reliance on pheromone trails in the ant Lasius niger 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.