Back

Fertilization reduces aphid performance but does not alter competitive exclusion between specialist and generalist species

Nakatani, A.; Shindoh, F.; Saga, T.

2025-07-04 ecology
10.1101/2025.06.30.662318 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how resource availability shapes herbivore competitive interactions is crucial for predicting pest dynamics under changing agricultural practices. Interspecific competition among herbivorous insects is mediated by host plant quality, yet mechanisms underlying competitive outcomes under varying nutrient conditions remain unclear. We investigated how fertilization affects population dynamics and competitive interactions between the legume-specialist Megoura crassicauda and the generalist Aphis craccivora on pea shoots (Pisum sativum) under fertilized and unfertilized conditions. Aphid population dynamics were monitored for 30 days in single-species and mixed-species treatments, and plant survival and biomass changes were assessed. Unexpectedly, fertilization reduced aphid population growth in both species, challenging conventional assumptions about nutrient effects on herbivores. Fertilization significantly affected M. crassicauda population growth but not that of A. craccivora. In mixed treatments, A. craccivora consistently excluded M. crassicauda by day 25, regardless of nutrient status. Plant mortality occurred in all aphid treatments except M. crassicauda under fertilized conditions. Our findings demonstrate that nutrient enrichment reduced herbivore performance but did not alleviate interspecific competition. The consistent competitive dominance of the generalist suggests that intrinsic species traits, rather than resource availability, determine competitive hierarchies. These findings have implications for pest management under changing agricultural practices.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
8
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
11
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
13
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.9%
15
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
20
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
23
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
25
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Journal of Economic Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%