Back

A NEST-based framework unlocks massively parallel simulation of networks of multicompartment neurons with customizable subcellular dynamics.

Wybo, W.; Ewert, L.; Linssen, C.; Babu, P.; Pastorelli, E.; Paolucci, P. S.; Morrison, A.

2025-07-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.30.662287 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While the implementation of learning and memory in the brain is governed in large part by subcellular mechanims in the dendrites of neurons, large-scale network simulations featuring such processes remain challenging to achieve. This can be attributed to a lack of appropriate software tools, as neuroscientific simulation software focuses on the one hand on highly detailed models, and on the other hand on massive networks featuring point-neurons. Here, we fill this gap by implementing a framework for the massively parallel simulation of simplified dendrite models with customizable subcellular dynamics. To achieve this, we leverage the NEural Simulation Tool (NEST), the neuroscientific reference with respect to efficient massively parallel simulations of point neuron networks. By co-opting the already existing model descriptions language NESTML, we generate C++ code implementing user-configurable subcellular dynamics. Through benchmarking and profiling, we show that the generated models run efficiently, leading to scalable NEST network simulations. We demonstrate relevant functionalities by showing that a key sensory computation - the association of top-down context arriving at distal dendrites in layer 1 and feedforward sensory input arriving perisomatically - can be achieved in a single shot fashion through apical calcium dynamics. Our work thus unlocks the study of how dendritic processes shape learning, and in particular of how brain-wide communication through long-range, layer 1-targetting connections steers perisomatic plasticity.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.