Rapid Assessment of Size, Shape, and Chemical Complementarity of Ligands for Computational Protein Design
Petrenas, R.; Ozga, K.; Chubb, J. J.; Romanyuk, A. V.; McManus, J. J.; Leggett, G. J.; Scrutton, N. S.; Oliver, T. A. A.; Woolfson, D. N.
Show abstract
Driven by deep-learning approaches, computational protein design is advancing rapidly, and it is now possible to generate many de novo protein structures quickly and robustly. This sets new frontiers for the field, including designing proteins that bind small molecules tightly and specifically, and understanding the non-covalent interactions that underpin such designs to make binding predictable and tunable. Here we address these challenges with a rapid physics-based computational method to generate isosteric and chemically complementary binding pockets for small-molecule targets in de novo designed proteins. We test this experimentally by constructing and characterizing binding proteins for several synthetic and natural chromophores. By evaluating only single-digit numbers of designs, the pipeline delivers stable proteins with pre-organized binding sites confirmed by X-ray crystallography, which bind the targets selectively with micromolar affinities or better. To illustrate the scope and applications of this approach, we incorporate distinct and coupled chromophore-binding sites in a two-domain de novo protein enabling controlled energy transfer between the two sites, and we develop a small de novo binding protein that can be used in live mammalian cells to visualize sub-cellular structures.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Energy Penalties Enhance Flexible Receptor Docking in a Model Cavity 96%
- A generative algorithm for de novo design of proteins with diverse pocket structures 96%
- Iterative computational design and crystallographic screening identifies potent inhibitors targeting the Nsp3 Macrodomain of SARS-CoV-2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.