Interrelations of aortic spring function, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and left ventricular diastolic function: The Framingham Heart Study
Cooper, L. L.; Prescott, B. R.; Xanthakis, V.; Rong, J.; Larson, M. G.; Benjamin, E. J.; Hamburg, N. M.; Vasan, R. S.; Mitchell, G. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundEnergy associated with proximal aortic stretch during systole is recovered as diastolic elastic recoil of the aorta that facilitates left ventricular filling. Impairment of this aortic spring mechanism may contribute to left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. However, cross-sectional and longitudinal inter-relations of cardiovascular disease risk factors, aortic stretch, and left ventricular diastolic function have not been examined. The goal of this study was to assess the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of cardiovascular disease risk factors and systolic atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD), a surrogate measure of stretch of the mechanically coupled ascending aorta, with measures of left ventricular diastolic function. MethodsAt two examinations (14{+/-}1 years apart) in Framingham Heart Study participants (N=7117; mean age 50 years, 55% women), we assessed AVPD and left ventricular diastolic function using echocardiography. We measured systolic AVPD using the integral of the tissue Doppler s wave. Additionally, we assessed e (the peak early diastolic tissue velocity of the lateral mitral annulus) and E/e (the ratio of peak early mitral inflow velocity and e). ResultsIn cross-sectional analyses, higher AVPD was associated with higher e ({beta} per SD{+/-}standard error=0.43{+/-}0.01; P<0.001) and lower E/e ({beta}=-0.35{+/-}0.01; P<0.001). In longitudinal models (between two examinations), greater change in ({Delta}) AVPD between visits was associated with higher {Delta}e ({beta}=0.40{+/-}0.01; P<0.001) and lower {Delta}E/e ({beta}=-0.23{+/-}0.01; P<0.001). We observed significant effect modification (interaction P-values: <0.001 to 0.045) for cross-sectional and longitudinal associations by median age, sex, obesity status, hypertension treatment, and the extent of aortic stiffness (assessed via carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity). ConclusionThe aortic spring function, as assessed via AVPD, may play an important role in maintaining left ventricular diastolic function, with putative effects modified by aortic stiffness, obesity, age, and sex.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Carotid Intima-media thickness, carotid distensibility and incident heart failure in older men: The British Regional Heart Study 95%
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 94%
- Effects of Age and Sex on Systemic Inflammation and Cardiometabolic Function in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex Differences and Role of Lysyl Oxidase Like 2 (LOXL2) in Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension in Mice 95%
- Extracellular Matrix Instability and Chronic Inflammation Underlie Maladaptive Right Ventricular Pressure Overload Remodeling and Failure in Male Mice 94%
- Endothelial Function: A Novel Marker to Evaluate the Prognosis of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Second Heart Field-derived Cells Contribute to Angiotensin II-mediated Ascending Aortopathies 93%
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 93%
- Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus: A Randomized Clinical Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- AORTA Gene: Polygenic prediction improves detection of thoracic aortic aneurysm 92%
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 92%
- Hypoferremia reduces long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after STEMI by averting the myocardial reactive iron storm 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.