Can a Conference be Epidemiologically Conscious? A Pilot Study of Implementing COVID-19 Mitigation Measures at an In-Person Conference

Structed AbstractIntroduction: Public health guidance about respiratory agents often focuses on the county level, overlooking local events that may increase transmission--such as conferences. Objectives: To understand conference-level mitigations, we assessed the use of a "COVID Conscious" protocol implemented during the 2022 North American Victorian Studies Association conference (Bethlehem, PA; September 28th to October 2nd). Methods: Eleven surveys measured attendees mitigation behaviors before, during, and after the conference. The proposed conference mitigation strategy included--for all 258 attendees (84 completed surveys)--provision of N95 masks, access to rapid antigen tests (RATs) and local public health information, and air quality improvement. Results: The proportion of attendees testing was highest in the two days after the conference (85% and 88%) with those reporting symptoms having higher odds of testing (OR: 3.81; 95CI% [1.19, 7.63; p<0.01). The proportion of attendees masking was approximately 90% throughout the conference. Respondents endorsed the provision of N95 masks (92%) and RATs (89%) and rated local surveillance information as the least helpful mitigation (14%). Two cases of COVID-19 were reported within seven days of the conference ending. Discussion: Our findings highlight an opportunity for critical public health practice: considering the convergence of "publics" during conferences and accounting for their unique structural inequities. Conference-level mitigation may act as a public health intervention by potentially reducing the infectious disease burden conferences introduce to a community, its local population and occupational health. To this end, we present a protocol for organizers to consider for implementation and further study