Parietal top-down projections balance flexibility and stability in adaptive learning
Jung, E.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, G.-H.; Ryu, G.; Lee, S.-H.
Show abstract
Rapid behavioral adaptation requires the brain to solve a fundamental computational dilemma: how to flexibly update learned rules while maintaining stable motor performance. This flexibility-stability trade-off is central to cognitive function and artificial intelligence, yet its neural circuit basis is poorly understood. Here, we identify the circuit architecture that coordinates this balance. Using a within-session auditory reversal learning task combined with circuit-specific manipulations in mice, we demonstrate that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) orchestrates adaptive learning through two parallel, anatomically distinct pathways to the auditory cortex (AC) and inferior colliculus (IC). These two circuits perform a double dissociation of function: the PPC-to-AC circuit facilitates flexible rule updating by encoding dynamic stimulus-outcome contingencies, while the PPC-to-IC circuit preserves stable action execution across changing rules. A feedforward network model further demonstrates that segregated stable and flexible top-down projections are necessary and sufficient for rapid reversal learning. This parallel architecture segregates adaptive and stable computations into distinct circuits, providing a mechanistic framework for cognitive flexibility and offering potential insight into conditions where this balance is disrupted, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Response outcome gates the effect of spontaneous cortical state fluctuations on perceptual decisions 98%
- Mixed representations of choice direction and outcome by GABA/glutamate cotransmitting neurons in the entopeduncular nucleus 98%
- Hippocampal-hypothalamic circuit controls context-dependent innate defensive responses 98%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.