Back

Esophageal Acid And Symptom Frequency In Gerd Phenotypes: A Quadrant-Based Analysis Of Subject-Level Variation

Gardner, J. D.; Triadafilopoulos, G.

2025-06-30 gastroenterology
10.1101/2025.06.29.25330512 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Lyon Consensus identified distinct phenotypes of symptomatic GERD subjects: NERD, reflux hypersensitivity, and functional heartburn; however, the Consensus did not describe a relationship between esophageal acid exposure and symptom frequency. ObjectiveThe present analyses aim to examine this relationship in ways that capture the variation among individual GERD subjects. DesignRecords of symptoms and 24-hour esophageal pH from 60 subjects with a normal upper endoscopy were grouped using the Lyon criteria for the three phenotypes of GERD (20 subjects per phenotype). Interval esophageal acidity was calculated before each symptom from 24-hour pH recordings. The value for symptom frequency was plotted versus the corresponding value for esophageal acid for each subject on a graph divided into quadrants based on the median value for symptom frequency and esophageal acid from all 60 subjects. Thus, each subject was categorized as esophageal acid: symptom frequency as high: high; high: low; low: high or low: low. ResultsSubjects were distributed among all 4 quadrants, and each quadrant tended to cluster a specific Lyon Consensus phenotype (Chi-Square P=0.00018). There was a significant discordant relationship between esophageal acid and symptom frequency in 63% of subjects (high:low or low:high; binomial probability = 0.0123). ConclusionsThe quadrant classification captures the essential variation in GERD subjects, aligns with phenotype groupings, reflects symptom burden (which phenotypes ignore), and maps more directly to possible treatment decisions. Given its simplicity and interpretability, a quadrant-based diagnosis and subsequent treatment choice may provide a pragmatic, evidence-based approach in routine clinical care.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.5%
2
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.7%
4
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.3%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
12
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
14
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
18
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
22
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%