PASHiOn: Personalised Against Standard High tibial Osteotomy, a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial: Trial Protocol
Gill, H. S.; MacLeod, A.; Poulton, L.; Smith, D.; Fletcher, H.; Mandalia, V.; Toms, A.; Hourigan, P.; Murray, J.; Trezies, A.; Wilson, C.; Davies, L.; Beard, D. J.; Peckham, N.; Rombach, I.; Cook, J.
Show abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is common, painful, progressive and disabling, and has significant personal and societal burden, particularly in an ageing population. Whilst knee replacement is successful for very late stage disease, it is inappropriate for earlier stages, leaving few effective treatments available for patients in the "treatment gap" between symptom free and late-stage arthritis. High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is a proven surgical treatment providing good long-term outcome, reducing pain and improving function. HTO involves changing the alignment of the tibia to correct improper joint loading. Outcomes of HTO surgery are linked directly to the accuracy of the surgical re-alignment with under-correction resulting in worse outcomes. Inaccuracies occur primarily due to limitations of the current planning and surgical technique. A new method (TOKA) has been devised involving personalisation and digital planning. This method uses a custom personalised surgical guide and plate, tailored to the patient. The aim of the PASHiOn trial is to establish whether digitally planned personalised HTO surgery (TOKA) increases the accuracy of bone correction in comparison to conventional HTO surgery. Embedded within the trial is a nonrandomised pre-RCT technology check and safety assessment of 5 patients (Phase 1), followed by a randomised controlled trial of 88 patients (Phase 2). During Phase 1 of the clinical investigation, 5 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be recruited and assessed in an identical way to the 88 patients recruited in the main trial, but without randomisation. Recruitment of the remaining patients (Phase 2) will take place after the six-week assessment on the fifth patient is complete and the oversight committee supports progression to Phase 2. Patients in Phase 1 and 2 will be followed up in the same manner for a period of up to 15 months from registration (Phase 1) and randomisation (Phase 2) (12 months from surgery).
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 98%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 94%
- The smallest worthwhile effect on pain and function for rotator cuff repair surgery: a benefit-harm trade-off study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 95%
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
- Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: The PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol (ISRCTN 46948079) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing multimedia patient education materials for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of patient education videos 95%
- Connecting real-world digital mobility assessment to clinical outcomes for regulatory and clinical endorsement – the Mobilise-D study protocol 94%
- Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Study of Patients undergoing Trigger Finger Release Surgery in a Primary Care setting – Organisational Capabilities, Outcomes and Benefits 92%
- Enhancing Palliative Care Registration Using an Automated Robotic Process with Clinician Validation: A PRADA Prospective Cohort Study. 89%
- Home monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis on reliability, accuracy, and patient acceptability 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A quantum-enhanced precision medicine application to support data-driven clinical decisions for the personalized treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis: development and preliminary validation of precisionKNEE_QNN 91%
- Comparison of Operative Time and Blood Loss with the FFX(R) Device Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation During Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study 91%
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Ultrasound Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.