Back

Timing of Illness Onset Influences Leukocyte Destruction in Sepsis

Morinaga, Y.; Sekino, M.; Tsuruda, K.; Hasegawa, H.; Hara, T.; Yanagihara, K.

2025-06-30 emergency medicine
10.1101/2025.06.28.25330461 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe clinical significance of leukocyte destruction morphology in routine peripheral blood smears remains underexplored. This study aimed to systematically quantify leukocyte destruction and correlate these findings with clinical course, etiology, and outcome in patients with suspected sepsis. MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study involving 30 intensive care unit (ICU) patients with suspected sepsis. Peripheral blood smear findings were evaluated chronologically, with the day of blood culture collection designated as Day 0, followed by four distinct phases. Leukocyte destruction was defined as clear evidence of cytoplasmic or nuclear dissolution. Correlations were assessed with 28-day prognosis, etiology (infectious vs. non-infectious), and symptom onset (acute [no preceding symptoms before admission] vs. non-acute [preceding symptoms present]). ResultsLeukocyte destruction showed no significant difference concerning 28-day mortality or etiology. However, it was significantly more frequent in acute onset cases within the first 48 hours (7.0% vs. 4.1%, p<0.05). Conversely, cases with toxic granulation were significantly more common in non-acute onset cases within the first 48 hours (70% vs. 14%, p<0.01). DiscussionLeukocyte destruction in acute onset and toxic granulation in non-acute onset offer potential diagnostic insights. These findings suggest uncharacterized leukocyte maturation or differentiation pathways influenced by illness timing, warranting further research for biomarker discovery and pathophysiology.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.