Back

The human transcription factor occupancy landscape viewed using high-resolution in situ base-conversion strand-specific single-molecule chromatin accessibility mapping

Marinov, G. K.; Doughty, B. R.; Schaepe, J. M.; Wang, T.; Smith, M. M.; Chen, M.; Kundaje, A.; Sun, Z.; Greenleaf, W.

2025-06-29 genomics
10.1101/2025.06.27.662080 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chromatin accessibility profiling is a key tool for mapping the location of cis-regulatory elements (cREs) in the genome and tracking chromatin state dynamics during development, in response to various external and internal stimuli, and in disease contexts. Single-molecule footprinting (SMF) methods that rely on the labeling of individual accessible DNA bases have emerged in recent years as a powerful chromatin accessibility mapping approach, as they provide not just an average readout of accessibility over a given genomic position but also the distribution of accessibility states within a population at the level of individual original DNA molecules. However, methylation-based SMF approaches have often been limited either in their resolution or in labeling readout accuracy. We developed a deaminase-based high-resolution strand-specific single molecule footprinting approach that uses highly active sequence context-independent endogenous methylation-insensitive double-strand DNA (dsDNA) deaminases (CseDa01 and LbDa02 C[->]U/T-ssSMF), which convert accessible cytosines into uracils (which are converted to thymine after PCR amplification). We demonstrate the application of the method to mapping single-molecule accessibility states in human cell lines in both a short and a long-read format, and quantifying the occupancy states of individual transcription factors (TFs) as well as TF co-accessibility and strand-specific accessibility patterns.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.