Dynamic frame-by-frame motion correction for 18F-flurpiridaz PET-MPI using convolution neural network
Urs, M.; Killekar, A.; Builoff, V.; Lemley, M.; Wei, C.-C.; Ramirez, G.; Kavanagh, P.; Buckley, C.; Slomka, P. J.
Show abstract
PurposePrecise quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and flow reserve (MFR) in 18F-flurpiridaz PET significantly relies on motion correction (MC). However, the manual frame-by-frame correction leads to significant inter-observer variability, time-consuming, and requires significant experience. We propose a deep learning (DL) framework for automatic MC of 18F-flurpiridaz PET. MethodsThe method employs a 3D ResNet based architecture that takes 3D PET volumes and outputs motion vectors. It was validated using 5-fold cross-validation on data from 32 sites of a Phase III clinical trial (NCT01347710). Manual corrections from two experienced operators served as ground truth, and data augmentation using simulated vectors enhanced training robustness. The study compared the DL approach to both manual and standard non-AI automatic MC methods, assessing agreement and diagnostic accuracy using minimal segmental MBF and MFR. ResultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for significant CAD were comparable between DL-MC MBF, manual-MC MBF from Operators (AUC=0.897,0.892 and 0.889, respectively; p>0.05), standard non-AI automatic MC (AUC=0.877; p>0.05) and significantly higher than No-MC (AUC=0.835; p<0.05). Similar findings were observed with MFR. The 95% confidence limits for agreement with the operator were {+/-}0.49ml/g/min (mean difference = 0.00) for MFR and {+/-}0.24ml/g/min (mean difference = 0.00) for MBF. ConclusionDL-MC is significantly faster but diagnostically comparable to manual-MC. The quantitative results obtained with DL-MC for MBF and MFR are in excellent agreement with those manually corrected by experienced operators compared to standard non-AI automatic MC in patients undergoing 18F-flurpiridaz PET-MPI.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning-based end-to-end automated stenosis classification and localization on catheter coronary angiography 95%
- Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T1 and T2 mapping 95%
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Monitoring mouse brain perfusion with hybrid magnetic resonance optoacoustic tomography 91%
- A compact breast shape acquisition system for improving diffuse optical tomography image reconstructions 90%
- Development and evaluation of a wearable peripheral vascular compensation sensor in a swine model of hemorrhage 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- AngioNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Vessel Segmentation in X-ray Angiography 95%
- Reproducibility of 4D Flow MRI-based Personalized Cardiovascular Models; Inter-sequence, Intra-observer, and Inter-observer variability 94%
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 94%
- Photon-counting cine-cardiac CT in the mouse 94%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning for Perfusion Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) and Volume (CBV) Predictions and Diagnostics 95%
- Inpainting as a Technique for Estimation of Missing Voxels in Chemical Shift Imaging 91%
- Clinical super-resolution computed tomography of bone microstructure: application in musculoskeletal and dental imaging 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.