Back

Honey bee worker jelly, a nutritional secretion fed to offspring, shows high among-nestmate and among-colony variation.

Westwick, R.; Rittchof, C. C.

2025-06-30 ecology
10.1101/2025.06.26.661879 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Parents have evolved strategies to reduce the risk of malnutrition in offspring, including the production of specialized nutritional secretions that are tailored to meet the unique needs of developing offspring. Studies in vertebrates, however, show surprising individual variation in nutritional secretions; the causes and consequences of this variation, and the extent to which such patterns can be generalized beyond vertebrates, remain unclear. Here, we investigated natural variation in nutritional secretions in an invertebrate species, the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). This is a unique bee wherein developing larvae subsist entirely on "jellies" (e.g., royal jelly) produced by glands in adult worker bees. We assess among nestmate and among-colony variation in the macronutrient content of the secretions fed to female worker larvae ("worker jelly"). Although female workers make up the largest demographic inside a honey bee colony, very few studies have investigated their larval diet; even fewer have included the scope of colonies needed to assess natural variation in this critical nutritional substance. In one of the largest such studies to date, we found significant variation both among nestmates and among colonies in total quantity and macronutrient content of worker jelly. This pattern was strongest, surprisingly, for proteins and lipids. Moreover, the macronutrient ratio in worker jelly differs substantially from source pollen, suggesting adult workers retain substantial consumed nutrients, especially lipids. We further assessed whether worker jelly composition was correlated with colony defensive aggression because of extensive links between aggression, foraging activity, and larval development outcomes; however, we observed no such relationship. This study is a critical step in understanding the evolution and maintenance of offspring provisioning strategies, as well as bee foraging ecology and nutritional stress response.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.