Hidden but discoverable diversity in the global microbiome
Prasoodanan P K, V.; Maistrenko, O. M.; Fullam, A.; Mende, D. R.; Kartal, E.; Coelho, L. P.; Spang, A.; Bork, P.; Schmidt, T. S. B.
Show abstract
Cataloguing Earths biodiversity remains one of the most formidable challenges in biology, and the greatest diversity is expected to reside among the smallest organisms: microbes. Yet the ongoing census of microbial life is hampered by disparate sampling of Earths habitats, challenges in isolating uncultivated organisms, limited resolution in taxonomic marker gene amplicons, and incomplete recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Here, we quantified discoverable bacterial and archaeal diversity in a comprehensive, curated cross-habitat dataset of 92,187 metagenomes. Clustering 502M sequences of 130 marker genes, we detected 705k bacterial and 27k archaeal species-level clades, the vast majority of which was hidden among unbinned contigs. At deeper taxonomic levels, we estimate that 10 archaeal and 145 bacterial novel phyla and around 80k novel genera are discoverable in current data. We identified soils and aquatic environments as novel lineage recovery hotspots, yet predict that discovery will remain in full swing across habitats as more data accrues. Finally, we show that prokaryotic diversity follows power laws, confirming century-old hypotheses on clade size patterns and suggesting that novel lineages arise within common (and fractal) evolutionary patterns, comparable to those among eukaryotic clades and viruses, along the full depth and breadth of the Tree of Life.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A human gut metagenome-assembled genome catalogue spanning 41 countries supports genome-scale metabolic models 97%
- Bacterial ecology and evolution converge on seasonal and decadal scales 96%
- Priority effects of heritable seed-borne bacteria drive early assembly of the wheat rhizosphere microbiome 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.