Use of causal DAG and regression analysis to understand and predict complicated osteoarticular infection in children
Cahill, P. H.; Anderson, A.; Yeoh, D.; O'Brien, M.; Robertson, T.; Clifford, M.; Finnucane, C.; Martin, A.; Stannage, K.; Blyth, C. C.; Marsh, J.; Bowen, A. C.; Snelling, T.; McCleod, C. H.; Wu, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundWhile osteoarticular infections of the bones and joints in children usually resolve completely with adequate treatment, some children will develop complications. Predicting which children are at highest risk of complications might enable prevention through more aggressive treatment. MethodsWe used mutual information and Kullback-Leibler divergence methods to compare the characteristics of osteoarticular infections at the same tertiary institution in Australia in two time periods, 2002-2007 (N=295) and 2016-2018 (N=192). We used expert knowledge to develop a causal directed acyclic graph (DAG) that depicts the mechanistic pathways of osteoarticular infections and their progression to complications. Guided by the DAG, we developed three logistic regression (LR) models for predicting complications and evaluated their area under curve (AUC) to assess their performance for predicting complication. ResultsWe observed a shift in the approach to diagnostic testing over the two time periods, with an increase in the number of blood cultures performed and a decrease in the rate of wound cultures. Fourteen of 43 test PCR tests (33%) for K. kingae recorded positive results. The established causal DAG clarified how the underlying, latent and dynamic biological processes become manifest as data. Utilising only data available at the initial point of care, the best LR model identified an optimal feature set that achieved an AUC of 0.85 for predicting complications. ConclusionsSupported by domain expert knowledge and data, causal and statistical approaches were combined to offer valuable insights for predicting progression to complicated disease for children with osteoarticular infections. Key messagesO_LIThis study facilitates the understanding of change in epidemiology and clinical management of paediatric osteomyelitis and septic arthritis by examining a prospective cohort of 295 cases (2016-2018) in comparison to a similar study collected at an earlier date (2002-2007) from the same facility. C_LIO_LIWe present a clarified understanding of the mechanistic pathways of osteoarticular infections and their progression to complications through the development of a causal directed acyclic graph (DAG) based on previously published DAG, recently collected data and domain expert knowledge. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate an approach to combine causal DAG, BN-based predictions of the causative pathogen, logistic regression modelling, and recursive feature elimination to achieve optimal performance in predicting complicated disease. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the causative pathogen among children with pneumonia using a causal Bayesian network 94%
- Modelling Disease Mitigation at Mass Gatherings: A Case Study of COVID-19 at the 2022 FIFA World Cup 91%
- Bayesian modeling of the impact of antibiotic resistance on the efficiency of MRSA decolonization 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning 94%
- Estimating the Efficacy of Common Treatments in Children and Young Adults Diagnosed with Cerebral Palsy Using Three Machine Learning Algorithms 92%
- The incremental value of computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia in predicting ICU admission 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of Existing and Novel Symptom- and Antigen Testing-Based COVID-19 Case Definitions in a Community Setting 92%
- Obtaining prevalence estimates of COVID-19: A model to inform decision-making 90%
- Using LASSO regression to estimate the population-level impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.