Back

Computational Design of Next-Gen Peptide Biopesticides: Targeting the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor in Rice Pests

Chen, X.; Zhou, H.; He, X.; Wang, J.

2025-06-30 plant biology
10.1101/2025.06.25.661460 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) threatens global rice production, and conventional pesticides face resistance and environmental challenges. We present a computational framework integrating AlphaFold3-predicted structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor 3 subunit (nAChR-3) with multi-force-field molecular dynamics (MD) refinements to design peptide biopesticides. Crucially, we introduce "Dipeptide Probing", a high-throughput MD-based screening strategy employing 20 phenylalanine-containing dipeptides (F-X) to map dynamic binding sites. Unlike rigid docking or static free energy calculations, this approach captures transient interactions and cooperative binding phenomena, identifying Phe-Met (FM) as the top binder through hydrophobic contacts and multiple hydrogen bonding, while{pi} -stacking contributed minimally to complex stability, contradicting conventional paradigms. Additionally, MD simulations revealed an unexpected Aggregation-Induced Hydrophobicity Binding (AIHB) mechanism: FM dipeptides self-assemble via hydrogen bonds, orienting hydrophilic groups toward solvent and exposing hydrophobic surfaces to the target, thereby stabilizing complex formation to the helix bundle surface of nAChR-3. This cooperative behavior, undetectable by docking (e.g., AutoDock Vina failed to predict FM binding) or static energy methods, resolves limitations of reductionist approaches. Our work establishes "Dipeptide Probing" as a generalizable paradigm for dynamic binding-site mapping and underscores AIHBs potential to revolutionize peptide-based agrochemical design by leveraging emergent intra-/intermulti-molecule interactions.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.