Back

Advancing in silico drug design with Bayesian refinement of AlphaFold models

Sen, S.; Hoff, S. E.; Morozova, T. I.; Schnapka, V.; Bonomi, M.

2026-05-06 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.25.661454 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Virtual screening has become an indispensable tool in modern structure-based drug discovery, enabling the identification of candidate molecules by computationally evaluating their potential to bind target proteins. The accuracy of such screenings critically depends on the quality of the target structures employed. Recent advances in protein structure prediction, particularly AlphaFold2, have revolutionized this field with unprecedented accuracy. However, AlphaFold2 models often exhibit limitations in local structural details, especially within binding pockets, which limit their utility for small molecule docking. In contrast, molecular dynamics simulations with accurate atomistic force fields can refine protein structures, but lack the ability to leverage the structural information provided by deep learning approaches. Here, we introduce bAIes, an integrative method that bridges this gap by combining physics-based force fields with data-driven predictions through Bayesian inference. Crucially, bAIes demonstrates a superior ability to discriminate between binders and non-binders in virtual screening campaigns, outperforming both AlphaFold2 and molecular dynamics-refined models. By enhancing the usability of AlphaFold2 models without requiring extensive experimental or computational resources, bAIes offers a convenient solution to a longstanding challenge in structure-based drug design, potentially accelerating the early phases of drug discovery.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.4%
4
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
5
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
10
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
12
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
14
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
18
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
21
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
28
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%