BELIEFS: A Hierarchical Theory of Mind Model based on StrategyInference
Manenti, G. L.; Khoneiveh, S.; Glaescher, J. P.
Show abstract
Theory of Mind (ToM) refers to the ability to infer another agents latent mental states, such as intentions, beliefs, and strategies, to predict their behavior. A core feature of ToM is its recursive structure: individuals reason not only about what others think, but also about what others think about them. Existing computational models typically assume that ToM Level-0 (L0) agents rely on a fixed heuristic (e.g., Win-Stay Lose-Shift, WSLS), an assumption that fails to capture the diversity of non-mentalizing strategies humans actually use. Here we introduce BELIEFS, a probabilistic ToM framework that infers latent L0 strategies directly from behavior using a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) that enables flexible tracking of elemental strategies and dynamic switches between them without relying on a single predefined heuristics. A second HMM tracks the beliefs about the Opponents ToM level and dynamic changes therein. We evaluated BELIEFS across four classic dyadic games (Matching Pennies, Prisoners Dilemma, Bach or Stravinsky, Stag Hunt) under varying learning rates and volatility of strategy switches. Predictive performance, quantified via cumulative negative log-likelihood (NLL) of the opponents choices, was compared against chance and a WSLS-based ToM model, with BELIEFS consistently achieving superior accuracy across conditions. Strategy inference was assessed using trial-wise confusion matrices and Cohens {kappa}, revealing robust above-chance classification. Additionally, separability of ToM levels across games indicated that competitive games are particularly informative for distinguishing recursive reasoning from deterministic L0 strategies. The model also successfully tracked the opponents recursive reasoning depth (i.e. ToM level) by distinguishing action sequences generated by L0 versus L1 opponents. Parameter-recovery analyses confirmed reliable estimation of core transition parameters. Together, these results show that BELIEFS provides a flexible, computationally grounded account of human ToM, jointly inferring surface-level strategies and recursive reasoning, with applications to modeling adaptive behavior in dynamic interactive environments.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel entropy-based metrics for predicting choice behavior based on local response to reward 96%
- Linear reinforcement learning: Flexible reuse of computation in planning, grid fields, and cognitive control 96%
- Controllability Governs the Balance Between Pavlovian and Instrumental Action Selection 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.