Back
Top 3%
14.1%
#1
11.4%
Top 0.6%
11.4%
Top 74%
6.2%
Top 2%
5.7%
Top 4%
5.7%
Top 0.7%
4.9%
Top 58%
4.9%
Top 38%
4.0%
Top 2%
3.7%
Top 6%
2.7%
Top 8%
2.7%
Top 4%
1.9%
Top 3%
1.5%
Top 48%
1.3%
Top 5%
1.1%
Top 14%
1.1%
Top 41%
1.1%
Top 7%
1.1%
Top 7%
0.9%
Top 3%
0.9%
Top 14%
0.7%
Top 36%
0.7%
Classifying Chest Pain as Typical vs. Atypical Fails to Discriminate Acute Coronary Occlusion and Does Not Predict Mortality
2025-06-26
cardiovascular medicine
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
BackgroundWhether symptom descriptors meaningfully change post-test probability for occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) in the emergency department (ED) remains uncertain, particularly when the reference standard is imperfect and may miss NSTEMI-OMI without ST elevation. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 13,262 ED encounters (2021-2025) with chest pain, ECG, and hs-cTnI testing. The index test was a legacy descriptor (type A/B vs C/D). The composite reference was door-to-balloon activation o...
Predicted journal destinations
1
Journal of the American Heart Association
92 training papers
2
Open Heart
18 training papers
3
Circulation
37 training papers
4
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
5
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
30 training papers
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
33 training papers
7
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 training papers
8
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
9
BMJ Open
553 training papers
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 training papers
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
77 training papers
12
npj Digital Medicine
85 training papers
13
Heart Rhythm
16 training papers
14
Atherosclerosis
16 training papers
15
Nature Communications
483 training papers
16
Hypertension
20 training papers
17
PLOS Medicine
95 training papers
18
eLife
262 training papers
19
eBioMedicine
82 training papers
20
BMC Medical Research Methodology
41 training papers
21
Frontiers in Physiology
18 training papers
22
Frontiers in Neurology
74 training papers
23
BMC Medicine
155 training papers